Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by firsty on Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:58 pm
I have been disapointed with the number of out of focus shots I have been getting with my D200 and I know it is not the camera or lens so I have been out today to try and improve my technique (I'm still very new at using a DSLR and my sholder is still recovering from a full reconstruction)
I found this fellow fishing in the river at 5.30pm today
D200, Tamron 28-75 2.8 @75mm, ISO 200 F4 1/320
I kown I have cut off his legs, but that was done because his left leg was completly broken about 50mm below his knee and was only hanging on by the skin with the bone sticking out. It looked like and old break but the bird was managing to live with the problem as I saw him catch about 5 small fish in the 20 mins I was there. He let me get very close as you can see by the lens I was using (must get a longer lens)
-

firsty
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:34 am
- Location: Baulkham Hills Sydney - D200
by Glen on Fri Mar 24, 2006 12:37 am
Amazingly tame bird to let you get that close. Nice sharp image though I am left wondering what made the splash or ripples just out of the frame. Nice.
By the title I though you must be the only one who didn't know they have advised against eating harbour fish 
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by birddog114 on Fri Mar 24, 2006 4:10 am
keith,
I thought you went up Parramatta for a delivery?
Wonder why they couldn't get you on a two way radio?
Very good and nice capture of that bird! how close you were?
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by firsty on Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:10 am
Birddog
I do all my deliveries in Parramatta and I never turn my radio on
I was about 3m from the bird.... none of the other birds would let me near them
-

firsty
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:34 am
- Location: Baulkham Hills Sydney - D200
by birddog114 on Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:48 am
firsty wrote:Birddog I was about 3m from the bird.... none of the other birds would let me near them
Perhaps you have a magic wand 
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by gstark on Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:24 am
Keith,
Great capture.
Why did you choose to exclude the dird's legs? Purely because they weren't "perfect" (for want of a more appropriate word)?
I think that regardless of their condition, they would/could have added to this image, rather than leaving it "legless", as it were.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by moggy on Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:23 am
There's nothing wrong with being legless, just the hangover the next morning!
 Bob.
.
-

moggy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Castle Hill, Sydney. - Fixed D70s
by firsty on Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:58 am
gstark wrote:Keith,
Great capture.
Why did you choose to exclude the dird's legs? Purely because they weren't "perfect" (for want of a more appropriate word)?
I think that regardless of their condition, they would/could have added to this image, rather than leaving it "legless", as it were.
More of an artistic decision on my part. The leg was very unpleasant and the bird was standing in an area with lots of rubbish that I would have been unable to keep out of the frame if I had included the leg… Maybe I should have cropped it closer so that the lack of legs would not have be an issue
-

firsty
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:34 am
- Location: Baulkham Hills Sydney - D200
by gstark on Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:32 am
Keith,
firsty wrote:More of an artistic decision on my part. The leg was very unpleasant and the bird was standing in an area with lots of rubbish that I would have been unable to keep out of the frame if I had included the leg… Maybe I should have cropped it closer so that the lack of legs would not have be an issue
I don't know whether that would have helped, or exaccerbated the "problem".
I understand why you've done this, but sometimes such unpleasantness and actually add to the feel of the image, rather than detract from it.
For my part, I guess I'm almost looking at this from a documentary or PJ aspect, but even then, not all art is "beauty", is it?
Now, there's a topic starter if ever I've seen one.
Isn't it great that we don't all see things in the same light?
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by kipper on Fri Mar 24, 2006 11:22 am
Gary, there was a post on NSN of a bird with bird shit on it's wing and some dirty featers. The response by one or two was that while the photo was a great shot, that an editor wouldn't touch it at all because of the soiled feathers.
Darryl (aka Kipper) Nikon D200
-
kipper
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3738
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: Hampshire, UK
by DaveB on Fri Mar 24, 2006 11:54 am
kipper wrote:there was a post on NSN of a bird with bird shit on it's wing and some dirty featers. The response by one or two was that while the photo was a great shot, that an editor wouldn't touch it at all because of the soiled feathers.
While probably true (it depends on the editor/publication) that doesn't mean the "dirty" shot isn't worthwhile. After all, who will record the fact that birds get shit on their feathers? Not all photographs have to be things of beauty.
If I was in Keith's position I would have photographed as many compositions as possible (including the broken leg). And possibly Keith did this. The question of which image or crop to use for what purpose comes later, and is Keith's choice.
But if he has images of the damage, I suspect that someone in the Department of Natural Resources or NPWS might be interested in a copy. They may still be worthwhile images to someone!
You'll have to excuse me, I'm feeling nauseous over the death of a friend!
-

DaveB
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
- Location: Box Hill, Vic
by kipper on Fri Mar 24, 2006 4:48 pm
Dave
I'm feeling upset now. I can't believe the idiots out there, and I'm guessing some of the clowns that fed him plastic bags are youths seeing as it's non other than school holidays. I tell you what I feel like taking to some of these twats with my gitzo with the wimberley head still mounted.
Darryl (aka Kipper) Nikon D200
-
kipper
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3738
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: Hampshire, UK
by ozczecho on Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:20 pm
Dave
The shit people get a kick out of is pretty scary. No punishment is enough for these people.
-

ozczecho
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 785
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
- Location: Beecroft, Sydney
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|