Mt William National Park, TAS

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Mt William National Park, TAS

Postby Ordinary K on Wed May 24, 2006 7:05 pm

Well, I should probly put my money where my mouth is, right?

Comments and criticisms welcome...

#1
Image
Had been playing with the usual long-exposure-of-waves-breaking shots when I spotted the feather in some windrift.
A little re-arrangement and I got a shot I'm somewhat happy with.

#2
Image
Cokin P121 grey grad G2 to control the sky.

#3
Image
Couldn't work out why I was getting a double image.
Wasn't until after the birds had flapped off that I realised I'd left the *&^%!! P121 sitting halfway across the lens.
Recovered reasonably well in post, but it's a web-only image dammit.

cheers + TIA

Keith
Ordinary K
Newbie
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 8:06 pm
Location: South Hobart

Postby avkomp on Wed May 24, 2006 7:41 pm

like the borboding effect in the second shot.

the indian brave walking thru the causeway doesnt do anything for me

The birds fall between the two.

steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby mudder on Wed May 24, 2006 7:47 pm

G'day Keith,

Gee, I really like the way you've seen and captured these, they show a good eye...

#1 A very interesting abstract, stark and lone subject, I like :)

#2, I love the moodiness and foreboding(?) scene, nicely exposed too... Pano crop suits it well...

#3, Great timing, they appear to be communicating... Tempted to crop off the black rock going along the bottom maybe? Dunno...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby Sir Tristram on Wed May 24, 2006 8:21 pm

I love the 2nd one. Almost bermuda triangle type look about it. Well done.
And this is where I met the leprechaun - He told me to burn things
User avatar
Sir Tristram
Member
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:17 pm
Location: Dundas - NSW - D70s

Postby ABG on Thu May 25, 2006 11:51 am

G'day Keith. I really like all 3 images. Is the first a crop or full frame? I'd like to see what it looks like with the feather over to the LHS rather than the right.
Andrew
User avatar
ABG
Senior Member
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Oatley, Sydney

Postby Ordinary K on Thu May 25, 2006 1:25 pm

avkomp wrote:... the indian brave walking thru the causeway doesnt do anything for me ...

- said with humour so it's all good :D
Seriously tho', I never figured this one'd have mass appeal, some'll like it, most won't.

Part of the reason I like it is purely intellectual, the image holds all four 'alchemical elements' - air (the feather), earth (the sand), fire (the reflected sunset), water (ummm... the water!). I'm not into that stuff, but I've wanted an image that does that for ages.

Damn, that indian brave comment will haunt me for life now, d'you mind if I steal it?

mudder wrote:... crop off the black rock going along the bottom maybe? ...

- tried that during post, but didn't like it so much. It left the image 'open' at the bottom and it felt a little unbalanced. Just a difference in our personal tastes I guess.

ABG wrote:... crop or full frame? ... feather over to the LHS ...

- full frame. A dozen or so candidates from the sequence had the feather over to the LHS, but the water/wind had shaken the feather too much (1/10s exposure) so they were unusable :(
It goes that way sometimes - I preferred the LHS composition too, but they *all* failed.

Thanks all for your thoughts - I've been lurking for a while and been impressed by the friendly feel around here, nice to see it extends to newcomers too.

Keith
Ordinary K
Newbie
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 8:06 pm
Location: South Hobart

Postby stubbsy on Thu May 25, 2006 1:43 pm

Keith

Interesting how we all have different views. For me #1 is the pick. I like the simplicity of the composition and the contrast between the sharp detail of the feather and the soft water. This capture is a credit to your eye for the detail of a shot. #2 comes close and you've used the filter to great effect. #3 does nothing for me - not enough to enagge me and the rock dominates too much.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby elffinarts on Thu May 25, 2006 3:11 pm

I liked #1......*chuckles* after that brave comment, I'm thinking a half a snorkel sticking out next to it would rock as well.

#2 really works for me. Love it :D
Mark Greenmantle
http://www.elffinarts.com / mark at elffinarts dot com
D70, 50mm/F1.8, kit lens, 80-200mm/F2.8, 35-70mm/f2.8, two 160w/sec slave strobes, sb600, "taller than me" astronomical tripod "can I have that step ladder please"
User avatar
elffinarts
Member
 
Posts: 495
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 2:17 pm
Location: Albion, Brisbane

Postby Trieu on Thu May 25, 2006 6:13 pm

1st shot is my fav. only thing in focus is the feather.
Cheers,
Trieu
30D and TWO L's
User avatar
Trieu
Member
 
Posts: 351
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 2:36 pm
Location: Sydney's West Canon 30D


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques