5 shot pano from this weekends waterfall

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

5 shot pano from this weekends waterfall

Postby avkomp on Tue Nov 29, 2005 5:06 pm

Image
just upgraded to panofactory 4 and decided to give it a run
This is a 5 vertical shot sequence of the waterfall posted on the weekend in this thread:
http://www.dslrusers.net/viewtopic.php?t=11840
This pano represents a little over 180 degrees

I originally looked at these after the I looked at the single shots pano cropped and thought the panofactory did an ordinary job of stitching them, but with the v4 panofactory, it did a much better job of stitching.

I still believe that the individual shots posted the other day work better than this.
The main criticism is that the right side of the image has lots of dark stuff not really contributing to the feel of the waterfall.

Didnt PP this other than stitching together and a little shadow highlight.
dont think the resize to 800 wide was kind to it either
Peoples opinions preferring the original post or the stitched pano would be appreciated.

Steve
Last edited by avkomp on Sun Jan 08, 2006 3:55 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby moggy on Tue Nov 29, 2005 5:15 pm

I agree with your comment about the dark area but otherwise it looks great, I also like the separate shots as well. I think both projects have their merits. Magic shots. :wink:

8) Bob.

.
User avatar
moggy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Castle Hill, Sydney. - Fixed D70s

Postby Killakoala on Tue Nov 29, 2005 5:24 pm

I love it.

I disagree with the dark RHS not contributing to the image. In fact i reckon that it adds some nice contrast to the light of the water. Although not central to the action, it is still an integral part of the image.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby sheepie on Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:32 pm

To me the darker rhs offsets the lightness of the water nicely, and creates a gorgeous image - don't talk it down mate, it's excellant!
If the stitching is as good as it looks at this size, then print it out REAL BIG and get it on your wall - and the wall of the local cafes in the area!!!
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby avkomp on Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:48 pm

thanks for the comments guys.


Sheepy: I had a look at it at full size and I cant tell where it stitched it.

I didnt look really really hard though.
I think that the nature of the shot may help hide stitching errors.
If it was a building etc you would be easily able to pick problems, but with this, the bushes etc will not show up.

As for printing it, I have had the dslr almost a year now and havent printed one picture. not one. very sad really. especially since I own and epson stylus photo 2100 which has a3+ capability and roll handling.

Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby sheepie on Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:04 pm

avkomp wrote:As for printing it, I have had the dslr almost a year now and havent printed one picture. not one. very sad really. especially since I own and epson stylus photo 2100 which has a3+ capability and roll handling.

Steve

Extremely ;)

You really need to print - photo's are supposed to be printed!
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby owen on Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:06 pm

Hey avkomp. If you need your printer tested out to make sure it still works just let me know :)

I prefer this pano to your other shots, and I'm in two minds about the dark side... it does offset the whiteness, but also when you look soley at the right hand side there is nothing there... however viewing the image as a whole it seems to fit.

Cheers,
Owen.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby avkomp on Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:20 pm

sheepie: I thought the whole idea of digital is that you dont have to print em!!

I just email happy snaps to people etc, although I wouldnt mind printing a few to see what comes out.

I was setting a colour laser up on a clients network the other day and for a test I printed the silvereye I posted here the other week. even at 700x500 it didnt look too bad, made me get interested in printing a few.

Then I have the problem of what to do with the print outs. My falls would fill up in short order, besides after 20 years my office walls have just been painted and it looks too nice to cover em :roll:

Owen: I do the odd test print to show customers but nothing else.
It was the dealer demo for the 2100 but they discontinued it and now epson wants me to get a 2400.

If I printed any out and they turned out any good I would wish to frame em, then I would have to send it out to do or go buy one of those framing kits with matt cutters etc I see mentioned around the traps. more money... less to blow on lenses etc!!
one day!!
Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby kipper on Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:21 pm

Avkomp, great work.

I'd like to see the following done though as the warmth in the leaves doesn't agree with me.

I'd like to see hue shited +15, saturation reduced by about -20. Then brightness reduced -25, contrast bumped around about +25.

Gives it more of an amazon look :)
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby johnd on Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:26 pm

Steve, great shots (in the other post) and great pano. I too like the balance the dark rhs gives to the light lhs. This pano seems like a good reason to get that printer working.

I've got panorama factory 3.4 and have been considering upgrading to 4. I have found with 3.4 that sometimes you have to do a whole lot of juggling around to get the stitching to work well. I take it you recommend upgrading to version 4?
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby avkomp on Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:28 pm

Thanks Darryl

I havent actually done any work on the image at the moment, was a function test with PF4. I went out to do the falls on sunday arvo and decided to do the pano but pf3.4 did a crummy job and I didnt like the overall image.

PF4 did a better job and I showed my partner and she liked the image but I just kinda prefer the other ones.

I will load the full size image up and have a look at your suggested settings and see what grabs me.

I have been thinking and it is actually closer to 200 degrees worth.
having it all in a straight line plays tricks with my mind.

When I was there earlier in the day, water was coming over the entire rock area and I found the current quite strong walking across it.

Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby avkomp on Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:29 pm

johnd:

absolutely upgrade to v4.
chalk and cheese with the job it did on these images.

Steve
edit:

dont forget to turn off exposure compensation and exposure matching though.
I choose to blend it and I will decide what to do afterwards.

steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby BBJ on Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:39 pm

Steve, this is fantastic. Loverly pano i am jealous, i think it is perfect print it and frame it hang on the wall and smile everytime you look at it.
Well done.
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40
http://www.oz-images.com
User avatar
BBJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3651
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X

Postby Hlop on Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:40 pm

Great pano! IMHO, dark areas on the right side add atmosphere and mood to the photo. Well done!
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
User avatar
Hlop
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Singapore

Postby johnd on Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:17 pm

avkomp wrote:johnd:

absolutely upgrade to v4.
chalk and cheese with the job it did on these images.

Steve
edit:

dont forget to turn off exposure compensation and exposure matching though.
I choose to blend it and I will decide what to do afterwards.

steve

Thanks for that Steve. Yes, I'll go spend the extra few $$s to upgrade. I do turn off exposure matching and correction by default.
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby marcotrov on Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:33 pm

Steve how the hell could you possibly be happy with this image! :shock: Bloody extatic perhaps :lol: This is a terrific pano image and definitely a wall-hanging keeper. Perhaps in your den where you can luxuriate in the reflections of the thoughtful photographer. :lol:
No doubt at all, the other guys have it right the shadow images beautifully balance the highlights. Great image!! :wink:
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques