I grabbed this image while walking home from a job the other evening. What do you think of the result?

G3/89B, handheld (1/160s @ 105mm-equivalent)
Experimental PP (only global via adjustment layers)
Mysterious lane?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Mysterious lane?I've been experimenting with a different IR filter lately, and I may have finally set up a PS action to process them in a reasonable way.
I grabbed this image while walking home from a job the other evening. What do you think of the result? ![]() G3/89B, handheld (1/160s @ 105mm-equivalent) Experimental PP (only global via adjustment layers)
Ahhhh......winter.......nice bit of work........
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Dave,
It's a cracker. The delicacy and delineation of the foliage really gets to me along with the geometry of the whole. Cheers, _______________
Walter "Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
Dave
This is excellent. Reminds me of some that Gooseberry did in SIngapore. The puzzle for me is that I've seen Leigh's shots with an IR filter (I'm guessing you're using a modded camera) and they just don't work like this. Is it not possible to get IR shots like this with just a filter? Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Yes I'm using a modded camera (ie. the usual IR-blocking filter inside the camera has been removed, and replaced with an internal IR filter, in this case an 89B - similar to the Hoya R72). The image you get with a combination of IR-blocking filter and R72 will be different to what you get with just an R72: especially for the wavelengths where the IR-blocking filter's attenuation is ramping up. The white balance used is pretty xtreme to counter the weird colours: down around the 2000K mark. Then in this image a Channel Mixer layer was used to swap the red and blue channels, then a variety of levels adjustment layers (in non-layer terms, Auto Color would be a good starting point). I'm not quite sure what you mean. This image was taken in Melbourne after 6pm so the middle of the day isn't the only time you can shoot with IR. ![]() With "pure" IR filters that let in light which isn't differentially affected by the camera's Bayer filter array (the resulting images are monochromatic) you get a feel for what tones an object is likely to come out with. With the R72-style filters that let in light which is affected by the camera's red Bayer filters, you have to combine this with how much red the visible colour of an object has (i.e. a green object will come out dark, unless it's reflecting a lot of IR light [like foliage typically does]). But whatever expectation you have of the scene, it's always worth trying (or just looking at the LCD on a compact camera) as there's usually something waiting to surprise you!
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|