Spikey

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Spikey

Postby pharmer on Mon Feb 27, 2006 10:37 pm

Just a couple of quickies, shot in the D50's default fine JPEG mode (usually shoot NEF)

No extra PP.

Image

Image
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Feb 27, 2006 11:31 pm

The first one doesn't do too much for me, but I really like something about the second one. Have you done much or any PP to these? Looks almost like you've done some seletive destat on the 2nd pic ?
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby pharmer on Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:27 am

No PP on these - the cactus had very odd mottled colouring, with old and new growth

I think the auto WB is a bit cool - makes some of the darker green on the side look slightly colder and desaturated
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:06 am

Fair enough, I like the effect anyways. Almost reminds me of the Rokkstar "MattB" patent pending destat look.
8)
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Willigan on Tue Feb 28, 2006 12:34 pm

The second one is definitely the pick. The new life of the flower growing out of what looks to be a pretty damaged cactus - great effect
Craig - Canon 350D, EF-S 18-55, EF 70-300
User avatar
Willigan
Member
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:14 am
Location: Canberra

Postby dooda on Tue Feb 28, 2006 2:32 pm

I really like the prickles on the first one. They pop right out. The second one is cool, I even sort of like the slightly washed/blown flower.

What lens? The bokeh looks remarkable.
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby pharmer on Tue Feb 28, 2006 2:36 pm

dooda wrote:I really like the prickles on the first one. They pop right out. The second one is cool, I even sort of like the slightly washed/blown flower.

What lens? The bokeh looks remarkable.


Thanks Dooda

Its just the 18-70mm IF-ED DX lens wide open at F4.5 @ 70mm

I dropped (smashed) my 18-55 kit lens that came with my D50 and replaced it with the 18-70 and have been very pleased with the sharpness, colour and bokeh of it.

Got me hankering for a 50mm F1.4 or 1.8 and a VR 80-200 F2.8 :D
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby wmaburnett on Tue Feb 28, 2006 5:12 pm

Very nice! the D50 sure does handel well, what metering mode did you use for the second one because it handeled well for the contrast between the flower and the darkers cactus skin.
~William
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
wmaburnett
Member
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Minnesota, United States

Postby pharmer on Tue Feb 28, 2006 5:26 pm

I've found the metering to be pretty spot on - it uses the newer Matrix II metering (same as the D2x and D200, but with fewer cells)

The photo was taken in aperture priority with the evaluative matrix metering.

I generally only use spot or centre-weighted for birds/planes against the sky or for intended silhouettes

The only down side (for me) of the D50 is the SD card, if I ever move to a d200/D2X or a sucesssor, I'm going to have to get CF cards.

Barrie
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques