Thanks,
dk

gone fishingModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
gone fishingI have a little secret about this image; so go ahead and tell me what you think. I always appreciate the comments.
Thanks, dk ![]() "Do more than belong, participate. Do more than care, help. Do more than believe, practice. Do more than be fair, be kind. Do more than dream, work." -W. A. Ward
It is an old slide that you have scanned and coloured?
mmm Not sure the shirt on the child reminds me of one I had when I was younger. Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
Mal, I appreciate you having a look. I guess my 1944 print from slide doesn't warrant more.
I purchased a box of over 1,000 slides at an estate sale and this is one of many pre-1950 color slides. I did no color enhancements or adjustments. The slide was speckled with dust particles and rather than clean them chemically (if that's even possible) I pp the dust using the salt and pepper filter. There are several other slides whose colors are a testament to Kodak of that time period. Sixty-two years old and they look like this...amazing. I am going to scan them and put the images on cd/dvd. Does anyone have any other preservation suggestions? Thanks, dk "Do more than belong, participate. Do more than care, help. Do more than believe, practice. Do more than be fair, be kind. Do more than dream, work." -W. A. Ward
is a nice image.
well picked as a scan from a slide too!! Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
I've had some success using air to remove dust, but it does depend on how much you value a slide. A blower brush can work, but a vacuum cleaner in another room is the best bet. You want the outlet somewhere else because it's blowing dust everywhere.
As far as scanning goes, I dunno. I've only used a basic scanner that gave me ~12MP but I've never been too happy with the images (it's over 5 years old) but I decided that I didn't care that much, so I scanned most of my slides/negs and dumped them. I have about 300 left from a WA trip that I'm thinking of getting professionally scanned, but the $2/ea is putting me off. http://www.moz.net.nz
have bicycle, will go to Critical Mass
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|