|
Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 by darb on Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:29 pm
and why?
Out of these two ;
I think i prefer the first, for the brighter moon, but then again the camp in the other seems less blown (someone moved their chair exposing the briht fire to my lens during the first one)
vs
and also ;
Personally i like the first as he's not looking into the camera, so less "setup" ... but i like the ghosting more. The way these shots were done is that my mate in red pants sat dead still for 2 minutes, whilst other guys stood still but periodically moved around the shot. I was in the shot, but not really visible (using IR remote)
vs
AND
this is just a different crop, intead of different exposure ... my mate sat dead still for 74 seconds ... though his beer bottle did appear to move a smidge.
vs
-
darb
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1020
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
- Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)
-
by darb on Wed Apr 12, 2006 5:14 pm
blimey that went down well ! lol
was really only the first i need though.
-
darb
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1020
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
- Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)
-
by mudder on Wed Apr 12, 2006 8:21 pm
G'day mate,
pair #1, I prefer the first for the reasons you mentioned, the moon is subtle (in the second I find it distracting), and the fact that the person isn't there has meant the big bright hitspot in the second...
Pair #2, I prefer the second, the amount of ghost subjects in the first makes it look setup to me, the second just seems more "natural" or candid... And I think the solid image of the person in the foreground chair strengthens the foreground of the image to me...
Pair #3, definately the pano makes the image stronger to me as there's much less room for my eyes to wander off up the trees...
Aka Andrew
-
mudder
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Burwood East
-
by ozimax on Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:29 pm
I like the second one, looks like a nice place for a camping trip, Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
-
ozimax
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5289
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
- Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
by suzanneg on Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:37 pm
Well, some cool photos. I'm going to have to agree with mudder on all 3.
The first pair - the first shot is the better one without the spot light in the camp, and the interesting beam of light coming from the fire.
The second pair - I like the second shot because the different depth of the ghost figures make it more interesting. In the first shot all the ghosts are very, well, ghosty (!).
The third pair - the tighter crop makes this a great photo.
Canon EOS 350D Tamron 18-200mm
Just what do you think you're doing Dave?
-
suzanneg
- Member
-
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:26 pm
- Location: Epping, Sydney
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|
