Do you like it?
DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
Easter bunny on the rocks?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Easter bunny on the rocks?
No bunny, but close ... unreal is real ... sleepy siren on the rock
Do you like it?
Hard not to like.
Are there any tricks with the background? Not that I took my eyes off the bunny  HB
Nice setup, but the shadows on the model are harsh and hide the finer detail
Need some reflectors on either side and/or a good burst of fill-flash from a Speedlight The foot prints leading from the rock are distracting and detract fromt he image (clone them out) 
No trick in the bg, expect clean the ocean grass from the sand
This is pure RAW.
I also use the reflector but there was to strong sun and reflector was creating very bad effect on the model. I took this photo with 400mm lens and I purposely leave this foot print on the sand for more depth in this image Usualy on this focus lengh every image is little bit flat.
Thx for feedback!
Looks quite red to me - her skin is quite an odd colour.
http://www.moz.net.nz
have bicycle, will go to Critical Mass
moz for preserve waves readable I little bit underexposed this photo - maybe this is reason why you see this photo with red dominant or I have weak monitor calibration
hope she delivers my easter eggs
nice background. think the model is a little dark though as has already been said Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
I'm not sure. It's just that to me her stomach and legs look quite red/orange - she's not fake tanned by any chance? I've just had a quick play with your jpg and I think it does look better with a bluer colour shift. But bringing up the exposure and correcting colour does blow out the rest of the shot and emphasise the sea haze. Not an easy situation photographically.
As one of the non-DOMAI here, I think leaving the model out and just shooting the interesting bits of the scene would have made for a better shot. http://www.moz.net.nz
have bicycle, will go to Critical Mass
avkomp - keep dreaming hehehehee!
moz how I wrote previously - this foto was only small piece of my bigger commercial project I can't take photos without model when I was there And you have right she had fake tanned on the skin.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
