Reverence

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Reverence

Postby stubbsy on Tue May 16, 2006 3:21 pm

A few more from Vesak Day at the weekend. All images taken with 24-120VR. More images from this day are HERE.

Vesak Day celebrates the birth of the baby buddah and as part of the ceremony people wash the baby buddha as a symbol of purifying themselves.

For a larger version, click a pic.

I'd be interested in reactions to my heavy use of a vignette blur in this first one.

Image

Image

This was a problematic image since the area behind the Most Venerable's head was completely blown.
I used a brightness/contrast layer in PSCS to tone it down a touch. Hard part was feathering the layer around the head.

Image

Image

Edit: Slightly updated versions of images 1 & 3
Last edited by stubbsy on Wed May 17, 2006 11:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue May 16, 2006 3:39 pm

#2 is my favourite here, the girls, umbrella's and balance between form and colour just play nicely together.

#3 is a pretty good recovery

#4 seems crooked ?

#1 Not sure I like the soft focus PP but regardless I get the story of the shot.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby PiroStitch on Tue May 16, 2006 3:40 pm

Stubbsy, I like the treatment you've done to the first pic but I think a bit of gaussian blur needs to be added to the outline of her head as the outline for the rest of her body is also blurred to match the background. Certainly gives a very peaceful feel to the pic.

At the other Vesak day celebration I photographed with Alex, it wasn't as extravagant as this...then again the weather was pretty bad too :)
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby avkomp on Tue May 16, 2006 3:43 pm

2nd is my favourite also.

the girls with umbrellas form leading lines into the shot and serve to highlight the main guy also.

Steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby stubbsy on Tue May 16, 2006 6:24 pm

Craig, Wayne, Steve

Thanks for your comments. I might revisit #1, take your suggestion Wayne re: blur and darken the vignette a touch
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby mudder on Tue May 16, 2006 7:17 pm

I actually find the vignette in the first interesting, but wonder whether it just needs some slight darkening maybe... Then again I tend generally to like the effect from a vignette...

The second image does seem to have a nice symmetrical balance and tends to make the central subject stand out more I think...

In the third one, the burning(?) seems to be getting into his right (our left) hand, was wondering what it was until I read the part about the highlight/shadow work...

Like the last one too, the majestic statue seems to impart a sense of overall power or reverence or something...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby stubbsy on Wed May 17, 2006 10:50 pm

Thanks Andrew

I agree with you - I'll darken the vignetting on #1 and unburn the most venerables ear on #3
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Matt. K on Wed May 17, 2006 10:52 pm

Peter
I'm suprise at the quality you can wring out of that lens! Is it underrated or what?
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby marcotrov on Wed May 17, 2006 11:06 pm

Carefully composed and colourful images Peter. I agree with the darkening comments on #1. I like it though :) . Certainly an ethereal, dare i say it, mystical quality to it :lol:
#2 lovely sense of balance and ceremony to this one however the discolouration in the foreground path is a little distracting and I think I would have tried to crop in a little tighter or clone out that yellow streak across path.
#3 I also like the tight crop on the priest and the water caught in mid air nice touch. I do think however that the pasty backgound around the head shoulders and arms of the subject a little distracting, a little like a cardboard cut out of the priest.
#4 Once again lovely sense of balance in the image, marred only, IMO, by the gentleman in the left foreground. Perhaps pulling away a little to include his feet as well may have created a better sense of balance and sense of completion to the image despite the fact you would then create more empty space in the right foreground. Not sure however if it would work :?
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby stubbsy on Wed May 17, 2006 11:31 pm

Matt

The 24-120 VR is both maligned and underrated, yet I fear it's softness may become more evident on the D2x hence my musings on replacing it with the significantly more weighty & pricey 28-70 f/2.8.

I've also just replaced images #1 & #3 with a slightly updated version of each taking critique here into account.

Marco. Re: your comment on #4 - I actually chopped his feet off in PP since he dominated and unbalanced the image too much IMHO. Here's the minimally processed original without the crop:

Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques