DSLRUsers.com

A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.

Skip to content

Does this look real?

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Write comments

Does this look real?

Postby Jamie on Fri Jun 16, 2006 11:45 pm

I took this picture last weekend as a part of a photoshoot for my car club but im not to sure if it looks real or not.
I have added motion blur to the picture except for the car. Did i pull it off or goof it up? BTW i shot everything at 800ISO, no wonder i couldnt get the effect in camera! :oops:

Image


I like the way this one turned out though.

Image
Jamie
D70s - Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G ED - Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D AF - Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G AF - Nikon SB600
Jamie
Member
 
Posts: 313
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:40 pm
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Melbourne <D70>
Top

Postby stubbsy on Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:01 am

Jamie

To have motion blur on a shot of a car that is behind you and approaching in convoy doesn't make sense visually (eg the following car should also be kinda in focus). It implies that your camera is also on a moving surface. In order to cheat you need to play WITH our senses eg a shot where the car is moving left to right or even more diagonally across the frame and the background blurred implies you are stationary and the car is moving. BTW the high ISO shows in both shots where there is quite a lot of noise in the darker areas (eg the fron bumper)
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
Top

Postby bloop on Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:04 am

Doesn't look real to me, the motion blur doesn't seem to agree with the direction the car is going.
User avatar
bloop
Member
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 12:06 am
Location: Chipping Norton, NSW
Top

Postby DaveB on Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:06 am

The motion blur on the lens flare is a nice touch. ;)
Actually, blurring an image like this is tricky: the angle and amount of blur will be different around the image (assuming the illusion of the camera travelling in another car ahead of the subject vehicle). The car in the background will have very little motion blur, the dashed line on the road will be blurred along the line, the cars on the right will be blurred horizontally, etc.
It's not objectionable, but it doesn't look real to me.


The 800ISO noise (especially in the 2nd one) is quite noticeable BTW.
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic
Top

Postby Jamie on Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:19 am

Thanks for the replies!

I never even thought about the car in the background to be honest. Now the more i look at it the more it doesnt look real, kind of makes me wish i never asked the question. :lol:

Noise - umm ok, i dont know what im really looking for when it come to noise in images unless its really obvious.
I ran all the images through noise ninja in auto mode (first time ive used it) and thought that all the noise was gone. You sure its not just the metalic paint thats making it look like there is noise there?

I really need lessons in PP'ing! :oops:
Jamie
D70s - Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G ED - Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D AF - Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G AF - Nikon SB600
Jamie
Member
 
Posts: 313
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:40 pm
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Melbourne <D70>
Top
Write comments

Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Copyright © 2005 - 2022 Gary Stark


Portal XL 5.0 ~ Plain 0.2
cron