these were talking around 5pm



hosted on flicker http://www.flickr.com/photos/ksphoto/se ... 170594497/
Roaming the cityModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Roaming the cityDecided to roam around sydney yesterday, shooting mostly in film, but when that ran out i switched to digital
these were talking around 5pm ![]() ![]() ![]() hosted on flicker http://www.flickr.com/photos/ksphoto/se ... 170594497/
my pick is #1.
the sky looks awesome! Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
I like the color and contrast of the sky in your PP version, however it lacks the detail in the foreground, in front of the white building. Perhaps through layers, and masking, you can PP the sky, but keep the original foreground? I prefer the detailed foreground, to the balck mass.
Great Work!
really? i personally thought the foreground was a bit too distracting, hence why i masked it out.
i'm going to try to perserve the light on the water in the foreground though, but i'm not sure if it should be there on the boats
my $0.02
i like the colours in the sky in the PP version better, but preffered the foreground in the original picture (just to be difficult). i hear what you're saying about it being potentially distracting but i think the extra foreground detail works better than the silhouetting in the pp version. Will
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|