Which Pair?

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Which Pair?

Postby wendellt on Sun Jul 02, 2006 10:43 pm

This set of significant portraits of two young rising stars in the modelling world, Tallulah Morton and Samantha Harris(1st native Australian pro model)

For the first time i just can't decide which one is the one

these were taken on the 28-70 at f4.5, 1/250, colour balance custom
sb800 snooted with 3 pieces of black card, on the sc-29

samantha's expression ain't too good here, i like it this image because of Tallalah's strip of hair
Image

this one is better, but i lost the strip of tallulah's hair
Image

the landscape somewhat bothers me because the chopped of the forehead too much, but i was aiming for that sort of tight framing. However the lighting on this one i am happy with
Image

this one, only thing that concerns me is that Samantha's face is cropped out
to me the composition is unconventional, but i'm undecided if it actually takes away from Samantha or it contributes to the overall image.
Image
.
Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents
Press - Getty Images
Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency
My Book - Zeduce
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Sun Jul 02, 2006 10:52 pm

Wendell
Good composition with these but the lighting is too severe and gets in the way. I find it distracting. Softer lighting would have made these images far more appealing. This is just a personal opinion and others might disagree.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby avkomp on Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:06 pm

wendell,
I also feel the lighting is too strong particularly so on the lhs model with her lighter colour skin and possibly makeup.

Steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby Mitchell on Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:13 pm

The lighting here does seem different to your normal style. Don't you usually use 2 pieces of cardboard as a snoot? Why 3 for this series?
The harsh side lighting is your style, however in this the nose shadows seem to be very pronounced.

I find the expression in the first a bit petulant and distracting.
My pick is the landscape with the chopped forehead. The chopping looks fine and both girls have a similar amount of head tilt in all dimensions. I think this symmetry makes it work.
User avatar
Mitchell
Member
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:16 am
Location: Île Saint Louis, Paris

Postby wendellt on Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:29 pm

thanks for the honest feedback

Mitchell this is my style pronounced shadows
lighted frotm he side

the landscape one is good but the slight tilt on the head bothers the symetry

used 3 pieces so i could get a variation in the light, as you can see the light falloff isn't even it's more interesting in this case

otherwise 2 piece either side of the flash head would of just narowed the light
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques