


A little play with PP on this one:

All taken with the 300 f4, 1/200 - 1/250, f4 @ ISO800
Hyde Park Wedding CrashersModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Hyde Park Wedding Crashers
Sweet work Yi-p!!!
I like what you've done with the last image here... Lovely bokeh in all images too! Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Nice
Did you speak to them and offer them some images? Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Didnt have a chance, they were so busy surrounded by photographers... ![]()
Yup... two Canon girls chimping on what looked like 20 or 30D's...
That last one is a gem... you just need to track the couple down and sell them it. They'd be fools not to buy it. Or poor. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Thanks for pointing that out, will keep this in mind on my next shots ![]()
Andrew, You raise a most important point, and one that I cannot emphasise too strongly when showing people some of the elements of making an image: take a moment or two before squeezing the shutter release and cast your eye - critically - around the whole viewfinder to see the whole image that you are about to capture. Empty headspace, or off-center subjects, such as you've highlighted, should be evident, and able to be corrected. Likewise such things as trees and telegraph poles growing out of the heads of your subjects. A person walking in the background? An ill-placed hand? Thank you, Andrew, for highlighting this most important issue. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Here is another one from the day,
Still plenty of headroom, but I believe this provides a good story telling background ![]()
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|