



Should really have called this "Looking"
C & C more than welcome, click on image for the larger version.

WARNING no NUDITYModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
WARNING no NUDITYSorry, but it seems if you want a lot of people to look at your pictures you add a warning sign
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Should really have called this "Looking" C & C more than welcome, click on image for the larger version. ![]() Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
Very unique image, and it works too.
For some reason I actually missed the "no" bit in the title, rushed to see the image, and got abit dissapointed ![]() Abel
Nikon d80, an ever-changing collection of cheap glass, and 0 art-sense.
I do like this one Mal, but find the over-exposed parts of the foreground model a little distracting. The focus and everything else work well for me, just the highlights are a problem
![]() *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Nice idea but the highlights are way too blown for mine.
If you shot it in raw you might be able to salvage it. Also what method of mono conversion did you use? Could be a clue there as to the reason for the blown highlights. Termy,
http://www.glennlegge.com "There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs." Ansel Adams (1902 - 1984)
Thanks for the comments. I was actually wanting to blow out the whites, partly to make the girls skin a little smoother. Both were not happy with the orginal as is showed up small imperfections. BTW I always shoot in RAW, what method did I use? Um I forgot SORRY. It was done late at night when I was suffering from jetlag ![]() Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
I quite like it. I'd only rate it "slightly unique" though, perhaps "quite unique" on a good day, sorry.
Moz http://www.moz.net.nz
have bicycle, will go to Critical Mass
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|