WARNING no NUDITY

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

WARNING no NUDITY

Postby Mal on Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:29 pm

Sorry, but it seems if you want a lot of people to look at your pictures you add a warning sign :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Should really have called this "Looking"

C & C more than welcome, click on image for the larger version.

Image
Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
User avatar
Mal
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:18 pm
Location: Berowra, NSW.

Postby Glen on Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:30 pm

Very novel image Mal, I like it
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby asaroha on Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:57 pm

Very unique image, and it works too.

For some reason I actually missed the "no" bit in the title, rushed to see the image, and got abit dissapointed :(
Abel

Nikon d80, an ever-changing collection of cheap glass, and 0 art-sense.
User avatar
asaroha
Member
 
Posts: 165
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:22 pm
Location: Sydney CBD

Postby sheepie on Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:01 pm

I do like this one Mal, but find the over-exposed parts of the foreground model a little distracting. The focus and everything else work well for me, just the highlights are a problem :)
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby terminator on Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:16 pm

Nice idea but the highlights are way too blown for mine.
If you shot it in raw you might be able to salvage it.
Also what method of mono conversion did you use?
Could be a clue there as to the reason for the blown highlights.
Termy,
http://www.glennlegge.com
"There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs."
Ansel Adams (1902 - 1984)
User avatar
terminator
Member
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Woody Point QLD

Postby Mal on Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:22 pm

terminator wrote:Nice idea but the highlights are way too blown for mine.
If you shot it in raw you might be able to salvage it.
Also what method of mono conversion did you use?
Could be a clue there as to the reason for the blown highlights.


Thanks for the comments. I was actually wanting to blow out the whites, partly to make the girls skin a little smoother. Both were not happy with the orginal as is showed up small imperfections. BTW I always shoot in RAW, what method did I use? Um I forgot SORRY. It was done late at night when I was suffering from jetlag :) All I can say is that I did it through Bibble, a program that I love.
Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
User avatar
Mal
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:18 pm
Location: Berowra, NSW.

Postby moz on Wed Sep 06, 2006 7:03 pm

I quite like it. I'd only rate it "slightly unique" though, perhaps "quite unique" on a good day, sorry.

Moz
http://www.moz.net.nz
have bicycle, will go to Critical Mass
User avatar
moz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:50 pm
Location: Coburg, Melbun.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques