

riverfire 2006Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
riverfire 2006a couple of photos from Toowong
![]() ![]()
like the first one a lot, well done
Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Nice pix griffo. Good work getting the F111 trail like that.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Both of them are nice shots. Well captured. Could you please post the exif for #1.
Cheers WW ![]() Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Did someone say mother-in-laws broom afterburner ![]() ![]() Both really nice shots, hard to pick between the two. Well done Cheers ![]()
Photo #1 Exif Data
2006/09/02 19:08:24.1 Compressed RAW (12-bit) Lens: VR 18-200mm F/3.5-5.6 G Focal Length: 18mm Exposure Mode: Manual Metering Mode: Spot 10 sec - F/7.1 Exposure Comp.: 0 EV Sensitivity: ISO 200 Optimize Image: Custom White Balance: Auto AF Mode: Manual Color Mode: Mode IIIa (sRGB) Photo #2 Exif Data 2006/09/02 18:59:28.1 Compressed RAW (12-bit) Lens: VR 18-200mm F/3.5-5.6 G Focal Length: 18mm Exposure Mode: Manual Metering Mode: Spot 10 sec - F/5.6 Exposure Comp.: 0 EV Sensitivity: ISO 320 Optimize Image: Custom White Balance: Auto AF Mode: Manual Color Mode: Mode IIIa (sRGB)
Mine as not as good as yoursMy River of Fire pics are pathetic in comparison. I took my little Olympus because I thought it would be too crowded to take tripods and the Canon, so I guess I paid the price. Well done!
![]()
Flash?Griffo, how did you get them? Did you use the flash to freeze movement? I've been having trouble taking pictures at night in raw format, let alone fireworks. I guess I have a lot to learn yet... Again well done, your pics are excellent.
Re: Flash?zafra - just kept it really simple - tripod, long exposure, focus at infinity. The F-111 photo was approx 2.5km away, but the fireworks were quite a bit closer (50-60m), hence a smaller apeture.
I didn't use flash in any of them, although in hindsight I thought I should have used some fill flash and taken some photos from behind the crowd, to capture the human element, although you'd still need the long exposure to catch the trails. Last edited by griffo on Tue Sep 05, 2006 7:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.
asaroha - it was more an afterthought than anything - honestly.
The F-111 was a long way away, and as such the focus was at infinity meaning DOF was not a big issue - hence the wide apeture, whereas the closer fireworks had the focus ring back from the infinity stop, so I guess a smaller apeture would give a slightly longer depth of focus. now I'm confused!?! having said that - my apetures are the wrong way around for my reasoning - like I said afterthought more than intention!
Griffo - Cheers for the exif. I would have expected a slightly higher F stop (eg F11) for the first shot, but you have done well. If it aint broken dont fix it
![]() Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Oh Wow! I wish I didn't have to work that evening! Thanks for the exif data, I've been curious about firework photos. V. upset I missed out... and I live at Toowong!
Well done! F-111 photo rocks!
Griffo
Both very nice photos. My pick is the second one, bacause it's not something you see every day, whereas the fireworks image (although nicely taken) is IMO just another fireworks pic. The image with the F-111 trail I find quite interesting and overlooking the blown highlights in the water, which would have been difficult to get away from, this photo makes me think what is going to happen next....which I find appealing. Great job ![]() Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
it was only maybe 4 seconds, but not all of the fire trail shows in the photo (obviously). I was listening to the radio where they "talk in" the aircraft (probably pre-recorded) and from Toowong you can actually see the aircraft nav lights as they scoot across Annerley on their terrain following radar....by the time you see the red lights and hit the button they're already starting to dump and light the burners....you have to be ready. thanks for all the comments!
F111I guess the issue here, and thanks for the EXIF data, is that you were quite away from the action and therefore had a few extra seconds and more room at your disposal. Those of us at Kangaroo Point, being closer to the action had less time and more people interference to contend with. I am not making excuses for myself and I thank you Griffo for the photos, the technical data, and what is more important the technical tips. Very nice photos indeed!
Previous topic • Next topic
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|