Beast's Bokeh

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Beast's Bokeh

Postby Oz_Beachside on Fri Sep 08, 2006 10:06 pm

Yesterday I took my team out on a cruise as a reward, and I took my D70s with my new Beast along, armed with my SB600 atop.

Very pleased with the results of the day, lots of party candids, and nice backdrops.

I like the bokeh I got, particlauraly nice close to its long end at 70mm, this one is f/8 at 65mm.

VERY HAPPY WITH THIS NEW LENS!!! And thanks for the bargains section making them even more affordable!!! :D :D

Image

Regards,
Oz
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby Yi-P on Sat Sep 09, 2006 12:39 am

Its a very capable lens, you should love and enjoy it :D
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby terminator on Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:47 pm

What new beast are we talking about? :?:
Termy,
http://www.glennlegge.com
"There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs."
Ansel Adams (1902 - 1984)
User avatar
terminator
Member
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Woody Point QLD

Postby adam on Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:51 pm

Super beast! Very nice! Yes, which beast is this?
User avatar
adam
Senior Member
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:27 pm
Location: New Caledonia

Postby Alpha_7 on Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:54 pm

28-70 2.8 if I'm not mistaken, the Nikon of course available for a steal in @ DSLR bargains.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Oz_Beachside on Sat Sep 09, 2006 8:58 pm

yes, sorry, its the 28-70 2.8 Nikon, from HK supplies!!!

Wow, love it.

Took some more today of the colorful brighton bathing boxes, and just love the clarity, control, confidence, and color im getting.

Just ordered the 85/1.4, cant wait for that too!!! :)
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby terminator on Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:20 pm

I`ve heard nothing but rave reviews about this lens.
I`d love to get one but I just don`t know if I could justify the cost for a lens that effectively starts at 42mm on a D200.
Would be a great walkaround lens on a full frame camera but not so sure with the D200.
Is it REALLY that good :?
Termy,
http://www.glennlegge.com
"There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs."
Ansel Adams (1902 - 1984)
User avatar
terminator
Member
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Woody Point QLD

Postby Oz_Beachside on Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:53 pm

I read a lot about lenses, and this was my #1 on the list. It has a narrow focal range which minimises compromising on quality.

Its a 77mm front, letting in lots of light/color/detail.

For me, Its one of my first investments in long term nikon glass, so it was a very careful consideration.

For my needs, it covers studio, portrait, wedding type pics.

A quick snap from this afternoon, for color consideration... note rainbow in sky. (it was raining as I took it)

(goto my pbase for large version)

Image

My planned kit is 12-24, 28-70, 80-200, and a 85/1.4
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby Geoff on Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:04 pm

We have seen stunning results fromt he 28-70 2.8 of recent times, these are no exception. :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby christiand on Sat Sep 09, 2006 11:44 pm

Dear OZ,

I have recently replaced my monitor and your image looks quite soft to me.
I'm surprised - a collegue of mine who has the 28-70mm f2.8 lens gave me an image of one of his chooks.
That image is SOOOO sharp and SOOOO colour correct - I was amazed - this was on my CRT monitor - now the LCD that I have just runs rings around the CRT - the chook images are now getting to the point of being phantastic.

Best regards,
Christian
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby christiand on Sat Sep 09, 2006 11:47 pm

Hi Oz,

did you bump up the ISO or did you underexpose ?

Cheers,
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby Yi-P on Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:43 am

Oz_Beachside wrote:Just ordered the 85/1.4, cant wait for that too!!! :)



You will love the 85/1.4 even more.


Im still learning on how to use the lens :oops: Too shy to post samples at this stage
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Killakoala on Sun Sep 10, 2006 4:51 pm

The 28-70, like most lenses, is a little soft fully wide open at 2.8f. But it's super sharp everywhere else :) There are not many lenses that are sharp at their widest aperture. The 85mm 1.4f is though.

The 28-70 has a proven track record with pro photogs.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques