

1 image - 2 treatmentsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
24 posts
• Page 1 of 1
1 image - 2 treatmentsTwo takes on the same image. Both appeal to me, but the B & W is ahead by a nose. I'd appreciate your thoughts (even if you think both treatments suck)
![]() ![]() Last edited by stubbsy on Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
#2 without a doubt for me... but i'm a B&W zealot
![]() cheers http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
I rather the B&W. It goes against everything I keep telling people, but it just seems to show the sky in a different mood.
The colour looks a bit washed out to me, but that may have been what you were going for. Hows that horizon? ![]() Last edited by norbs on Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
B&W for sure! the sky is so much more powerful in the black and white!
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
Looks like the B & W is in front. I also forgot to thank Leigh for his help with the custom OptikVerv B & Wfilter
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Peter,
Colour. But you need to crop about 75% of the path from the bottom first. Just leave a thin ribbon of concrete along the bottom, and tell me what you think. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Matt - It's something I thought about too Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Peter
I prefer the colour version....and the crop (as Gary suggested) I feel suits the image better. It has more "weight" at the bottom, leaving the expanse of the sky to finish the image nicely. I'm not sure if it's my LCD monitor at work (which isn't calibrated), but the colour version seems to lack a very slight touch of contrast (IMO)....however this may only be due to my monitor. Nice work. Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Peter,
Thanx, and yes, I think the crop, and in colour, is the winner. But here is something very interesting for you to ponder. With the cropped version (I've not check this in the other two) you have the image level in terms of the path at the bottom matching the crop line. But the horizon - actually a false horizon, as it's the shoreline on the other side of the water - is not level. I am not sure what I would do about this, because while it's not a true horizon, it sill acts as one. As I said, interesting to ponder. ![]() g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Thank you all for your critiques.
Gary - as for your "level" condundrum my answer is this - the finished image sans the problem (done using a feathered selection of that part of the horizon across the whole of the image followed by a skew of just that piece to "lift" the RHS) ![]() Edit: Fixed image to be the recropped version Last edited by stubbsy on Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Peter,
EnergyPolice would be impressed with your solution. ![]() g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
I'll go the colour version Peter... I think your treatment on the B&W too aggressive for my taste, but I also think the subject matter better suits the nice pastel colours you've presented. I also agree with the new crop but more because it removes some blemishes on the concrete path that were a distraction from the rest of the composition.
Photography is not a crime, but perhaps my abuse of artistic license is?
Just to be difficult...Actually, I like the three of them...but the colour cropped one I think is the better one of the two. However, just imagine the cropped one in black and white with someone's back contemplating the weather. So, I think I like the B&W because of the mood it creates.
Previous topic • Next topic
24 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|