Gym shoot

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Gym shoot

Postby Justin on Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:33 pm

So, my assignment was to get shots of someone so you knew what their passion is.

Not being used to models, and also the crowded environment of the gym I struggled with this one. I think the last shot is the one I will use for the assignment.

Image

Image

Image

Image
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby Kyle on Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:38 pm

I like the 2nd one best, personally :)

The last is good, apart from the flare :(

Nice work none the less justin :up:
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby Matt. K on Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:50 pm

Justin
I like it that you get close and fill the frame. This gives your images impact. I like the hard edge style of the images. They work well and you can feel the heat.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Alpha_7 on Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:54 pm

#2 and #4 are my picks.
Love the tightness in #2 and the muscle definition just a shame there's not face (a well placed mirror could of made for a cracker shot) regardless it's a high impact shot as Mattk said above.

#4 works on the level that you have your subject and the environment where she enjoys her passion, I think with some PP (you shot raw I hope ?) I think you'll have another winner, I didn't notice the flare until it was mentioned.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Justin on Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:02 pm

Alpha, help! What would you suggest on the PP front for #4 any more than this is beyond me!
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby Yi-P on Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:10 pm

Suggestion of PP for #4 is lowering exposure from RAW and then readjust the curves to save some midtone saturation.

May boost up the red and blue channel to bring up the saturation of her clothes and the gym behind it.

Flare can be easily cloned out in this pic, not much to worry about.

Then a layer of curves and level blending in Photoshop, save your day and the nice pic :)
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Justin on Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:24 pm

Couple of questions

How do I boost the channels

What do you mean by blending?
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby norbs on Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:29 pm

I am supposed to critique the photos? :shock:
norbs
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: -30.940579 144.421865

Postby Yi-P on Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:33 pm

Justin wrote:How do I boost the channels

In Nikon Capture, this is done just simplier. Go into Chroma correction, see the red part of it, creat a 'curve' rising on the red, and all red colour are saturated. Lowering = desaturating.

In Photoshop or the more advanced way, you can go into curves/level and select the RED channel, adjust the curves there for direct channel manipulation, may come out bit unexpected and affects WB harder than using 'chroma' correction in Capture.

What do you mean by blending?


In Photoshop, create a new 'adjustment layer' either be levels or/and curves. This will affect the image separately and can be removed, readjusted at all times. You will see them as separate layers on the layer pallette. Adjust the opacity of these layers to blend the effect more or less to what you want.
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Justin on Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:51 pm

Here's my first stab - thanks! saved heaps and got quite a bit of sky back.

I think there is too much purple now, but I'm off to bed!

Image
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby Yi-P on Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:44 am

Very good first attempt.

Spent a few mins on PP, here are some fixes done:

adjusted colour balance
cloned out sky
slight tonal correction


Results:
Image


Im sleeping as well now :)
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby gstark on Mon Sep 18, 2006 1:01 am

Ok, the saturation has been improved, now we need to apply a bit of cropping.

We want the whole of her bag on the left, not not too much more on that side. Crop from there, and you'll have her walking into the image, with the "Fitness First" sign on our right.

There's your image!
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby macka on Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:25 am

Hi Justin, just some of my thoughts for you.

I think the main problem with #1 is that there are too many distractions in the background; the men, the signs, and the weird pipes on the wall, which all take too much attention away from your subject (otherwise I think it would have been a good shoot composition-wise if it was just here against a blank b/g).

I really #2, and whilst I agree with Craig in that it's probably not the best for your assignment (can't see her face), I think it's a strong image (literally!). The high key outer areas of the shot work really well to focus all one's attention on her back, and there is a real sense of movement and strength looking at those muscles. Also I think this shot has a nice amount of saturation (not sure whether you've increased it or not, but it looks good to me).

#3 didn't really work for me, mainly because there just wasn't enough of the image in focus, and I found having her face (which in a 'standard' portrait one would normally focus on) motion blurred without having anything else really sharp to focus on just meant that the image didn't really work overall.

With #4 I think you've done a much better job the second time around, and I agree with Gary about the crop (no need to have more of those cars than is necessary in the b/g). I like the composition, you've obviously put some thought into it when asking her to pose and I think it's worked out well for you. Edit: you could also consider cloning out the light on top of the building.

Cheers
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby Laurie on Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:40 am

fitness first at rockdale?
i personall like the symmetrical look of #2 and i like #4.
nicely done
User avatar
Laurie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Mortdale.Sydney/NSW.AU

Postby Glen on Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:20 pm

Justin, Like your style. 4 is my least favourite shot as it seems more standard compared to the rest. 3 would be my pic if it was in focus.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Justin on Mon Sep 18, 2006 8:42 pm

Macka / Glen / Gary / Alpha /Matt - thanks for the feedback!

Yi-p - you are going to save my assignment with your advice, many thanks

#1 - I struggled with this envrionment, one of my favourite shots and it's just cluttered with c*&p

#2 - actually desaturated about 10% - trick I learnt from looking at Wendell and NNNNsic's photos

#3 - yes, as you and Glen have noticed it's one of those shots that nearly worked :lol:

#4 I am working on the new version will post soon I am procrastinating now not looking forward to fixing that sky
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby Justin on Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:00 pm

Ta-da!

Image
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby Geoff on Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:11 pm

Great PP work Justin - well done :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Glen on Mon Sep 18, 2006 10:22 pm

Impressive PP
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby jethro on Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:15 pm

I would blur the background to create depth of field on No 4. Someone here cloned the sky. WHY? Create a new one smooth it off. I also think its way to contrasty. Ill post tomorrow and show my thoughts
Jethro
shoot it real.

look! and see. Shoot and feel
User avatar
jethro
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1006
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: down south, sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques