DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
Here's looking at you, kid.Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Here's looking at you, kid.
Another from yesterday's macro experiments. This one is not as sharp around the edges as I wanted to concentrate on the iris patterns - C&C appreciated.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Simon - the problem with macro and the super shallow DOF is the plane or angle of the shot. In this pic, which BTW I like, shows that the angle was slightly inclined more to the bottom of the shot. This is evident by the sharpness of the bottom compared to the top. The eye itself is slightly out of focus as well.
But, as I state above, I like this shot and you must be extremely happy with your new purchase. Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
thats some serious eye colour.
I'd prob try and go just for the iris, get whoever to hold their eye open if need be to get the whole thing, gaffer tape maybe. cause that colour is great and a whole images of just that would be very compelling Simon
www.colberne.com.au I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
Thanks fellas.
Chris - well spotted and great advice. Though I know DOF is the critical factor with these lenses, knowing exactly what's going on with it and then being able to make the necessary corrections is how the real experts get the results. Thanks for the tip. This was shot at 1/60sec f32 with flash (obviously) but was handheld and manually focussed. I know I was moving around a bit as the shutter release was pressed so the focus point would have moved. Tripod next time! Matt - this is my 13yr old daughter. As Chris mentioned in my other post, she takes after her mother! Simon - I pushed the cyan and blue sats up to +10. Not a great deal but just enough to separate some of the colours in the iris, the blues/greens/oranges and whites. I was amazed when I saw the full-size original and can see why iridologists can lose themselves in their work! Oh...I'm out of gaffer tape. Staple gun perhaps?  Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
