Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Yi-P on Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:19 pm
An experiment to create massive print, its been very successfull.
Stitched out from 28 separate 6MP files from a D70, creating a massive 60MP (12,000 x 5,000 @ 300dpi) panorama, yet the view is NOT WIDE, just a nice wide angle panorama to be blown up till metres long!!
Rough calculation of this one, can be blown up to 4 metres wide and still have enough resolution to look sharp!
Here are two 100% crop from this massive image:
Lets play this game called "find the duck"
C&C Welcomed
-

Yi-P
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
- Location: Sydney -- Ashfield
-
by Laurie on Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:25 pm
freaking awesome!
just one question though, why that spot? why that scene?
nicely done though.
-

Laurie
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:46 pm
- Location: Mortdale.Sydney/NSW.AU
-
by owen on Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:25 pm
You did a terrific job stitching it all together. The only noticable parts are in the water where you have the different colours.
I've looked everywhere and still can't find a duck though 
-

owen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
- Location: Nowra, NSW
-
by Yi-P on Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:32 pm
Laurie,
Why the spot/scene? Simply because I was there by that time I 'saw' the shot in my head... I wanted a dusk/sunset view of the harbour which is always spectacular, but I couldnt stay long enough nor had my tripod with me.
Owen,
Nice looking. Tho the uneven water exposure is from the reflection of the buildings, if you notice the middle has more white/grey buildings than to the sides with reflective blue coat windows. Then maybe I had a polariser on, it had affected a bit in the exposure as well.
And keep looking for the duck (seagull actually), you just havent tried hard enough  Its a sitting duck somewhere in the pic
-

Yi-P
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
- Location: Sydney -- Ashfield
-
by Glen on Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:58 pm
Yi-p, very, very impressive. Great job of stitching it together.
ps is the seagull above the n of Darling?
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by Justin on Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:01 pm
I count five on the water and twenty-five behind you wondering what you were up to!
Fantastic work!
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4 picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
-

Justin
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
- Location: Newtown, Sydeny
-
by Yi-P on Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:32 am
Yeah, the duck shown is the one sitting on top of the 'n' of Darling
This massive image took me 35mins on a dual core CPU to render. A 550MB uncompressed file, or a 38MB JPEG... compressing down further gets me to 8.7MB JPEG... Its one of the biggest I've ever got at the moment... should be creating some more of different views 
-

Yi-P
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
- Location: Sydney -- Ashfield
-
by cawdor on Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:45 am
Holy crap, that's awesome!! It must have taken you a while to stitch together, you must be a patient man
That's definitely worth enlarging to poster size and putting on a wall.
Tim D300 | D200 | F90x | 70-200 f2.8 VR | Tamron 90 f2.8 Macro | Tokina 12-24 f4 | Sigma 18-50 f2.8 Macro | Nikon SB-800
-
cawdor
- Member
-
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:00 pm
- Location: Perth, WA
by Reschsmooth on Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:25 am
Great work Yi-p - the only thing is the IBM building looks like it is leaning to the right a bit.
P
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by Yi-P on Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:26 pm
Reschsmooth wrote:Great work Yi-p - the only thing is the IBM building looks like it is leaning to the right a bit.
P
Yes, I've noticed that too, but I try to avoid not to correct this much as the original files takes a minute to load and save on photoshop...
I'll just live on with it, its not that much a noticeable distortion.
-

Yi-P
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
- Location: Sydney -- Ashfield
-
by Phenn on Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:47 pm
How do you go about taking the shots to make up a picture like this?
-
Phenn
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 4:58 pm
- Location: Melbourne
by elffinarts on Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:48 pm
very impressive set of shots!! How long did it take to stich the 28 shots? Done in photoshop or one of the panoramic programs?
Mark Greenmantle
http://www.elffinarts.com / mark at elffinarts dot com
D70, 50mm/F1.8, kit lens, 80-200mm/F2.8, 35-70mm/f2.8, two 160w/sec slave strobes, sb600, "taller than me" astronomical tripod "can I have that step ladder please"
-

elffinarts
- Member
-
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 2:17 pm
- Location: Albion, Brisbane
-
by Yi-P on Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:44 am
How do you go about taking the shots to make up a picture like this?
Using a medium long telephoto, point at the start of your edge, continue taking frame by frame until you hit the other part of your view angle. Overlaping by about 1/3 or 1/2 of each frame. You must have the picture in your mind as a puzzle first, or else you end up with missing pieces around the important edges... How long did it take to stich the 28 shots? Done in photoshop or one of the panoramic programs?
Used 'autositch' program (its free). Took me about 35minutes to render this image, and another 1hr to carefully fix up the details.
-

Yi-P
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
- Location: Sydney -- Ashfield
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|