Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by DanielA on Sun Oct 01, 2006 6:47 pm
I was down at Wirrina Cove, south of Adelaide, and tried my ND (solid) filter for the first time to try and capture some silky water shots. Here are the results.
1/200s no ND
0.5s
1s
I guess I find the shots a bit boring. What would you do to make the most of this location?
I would have thought the waves would have been enough to make silky water. Did I really need to go all the way to multiple seconds of exposure for perhaps multiple waves?
Thanks
Daniel
-

DanielA
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 963
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:23 pm
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
-
by jethro on Sun Oct 01, 2006 6:59 pm
Daniel get in a lot closer. Pick up some of the spray and action. Get on the rocks near the action.
Jethro
shoot it real.
look! and see. Shoot and feel
-

jethro
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:03 pm
- Location: down south, sydney
by DanielA on Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:16 pm
jethro wrote:Daniel get in a lot closer. Pick up some of the spray and action. Get on the rocks near the action.
I know you are right, but I'd be concerned with the D70-spray-rocks combination.
Thanks
Daniel
-

DanielA
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 963
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:23 pm
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
-
by jethro on Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:38 am
Nothing a good clean down wouldn't fix. I cop sea spray all the time and do my cleaning after the event.
Jethro
shoot it real.
look! and see. Shoot and feel
-

jethro
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:03 pm
- Location: down south, sydney
by Willy wombat on Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:41 am
Definately gettign closer with a focus on the water moving over the rocks.
-

Willy wombat
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2284
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia
by johnd on Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:31 pm
Hi daniel, I like the effect in #2 with 0.5 sec exposure. It gives the silky water effect without making it look too unrealistic. I've seen shots with silky smooth spray shooting up in the air and it just doesn't look right (IMHO). #2 looks smooth and tranquil but still credible.
Oh, and I agree, get in closer. There's a famous saying, don't know who by (probably Ansell Adams or someone like that) that says: If your photos aren't good enough, you're not close enough.
Nice result on #2 though.
Cheers
John
-

johnd
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
- Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.
-
by DanielA on Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:36 pm
Thank you John.
I guess closer it is then
Thanks all.
Daniel
-

DanielA
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 963
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:23 pm
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
-
by Ady on Tue Oct 03, 2006 2:52 am
I agree with getting the closer. The lower the better for this situation I think.
-
Ady
- Member
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:47 pm
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|