This was a momonet from a car shoot, sun was warming down, screwed on a CPL onto the Beast (first time using a CPL in 15 years), and just took two shots straight into the SUN!
What do you think?

CPL Beast INTO SUN/BEACHModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
CPL Beast INTO SUN/BEACHHi,
This was a momonet from a car shoot, sun was warming down, screwed on a CPL onto the Beast (first time using a CPL in 15 years), and just took two shots straight into the SUN! What do you think? ![]()
I think you would have got much better results without using a filter - especially a CPL, which has almost nil effect shooting straight into the sun.
What it will do in this situation though, is reduce your contrast, because of all the reflections bouncing around between the filter elements (a CPL is comprised of a piece of plastic polarising film sandwiched between two pieces of glass) Did you take any pix without a filter for comparison? Cheers What's another word for "thesaurus"?
Yes, just one good for display, the other is nearly same, without runner.
THanks for the advise. I thought the CPL would increase the contrast in clouds etc, but didnt know that the direct sun may reduce, rather than increase. No wonder I couldnt see a visual differences while looking TTL with CPL on. ![]()
You dont get a polarising effect with CPL when shooting straight or into or back to the sun...
General rule is keep between 45 to 90 deg axis from the sun. The 90 deg perpendicular lens axis to the sun is most effective polarising zone. Also, CPL are less effective during the 'golden times'. They are very highly effective when the sun is up high shining harsh lights. During midday, you can polarize so much that sky goes DARK!!
Sure looks like "Stella" to me. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
what is the EXIF for that shot.
I just wanna know what the shutter was considering it was straight into the sun.
If Interested, You can see in my pbase at
http://www.pbase.com/oz_beachside/image/68822978&exif=Y Full EXIF Info Date/Time 23-Sep-2006 16:54:17 Make Nikon Model NIKON D70s Flash Used No Focal Length 60 mm Exposure Time 1/640 sec Aperture f/11 ISO Equivalent Exposure Bias White Balance Metering Mode matrix (5) JPEG Quality Exposure Program manual (1) Focus Distance
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|