London Part 2 (Color)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

London Part 2 (Color)

Postby fishafotos on Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:24 am

A few of color images from London, please let me know what u think.

Image

Image

Image

Image

I hope this post is better than the other one.

Please be brutal

Harry
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste.

http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
User avatar
fishafotos
Member
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:48 am
Location: East Fremantle, W.A - D80

Postby lukeo on Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:36 am

I like this set, well put together. I don't have the shooting expertise to go into detail I am sure others will.

Just a side note you don't need to save 800x533 images at maximum quality these are some 650KB each, try one or two notches down from maximum when you save them, you won't be able to tell the difference and they'll be sub 250KB each.

Cheers, keep posting! I loved your B&W ones also.
D70, Sigma 10-20mm, 28-70 F2.8 EX, 70-200mm F2.8 EX, Nikon 50mm AFD, http://lukeo.fotopic.net/
lukeo
Member
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:42 am
Location: Kensington, WA

Postby stubbsy on Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:07 pm

Harry

On my calibrated monitor these all seem to have a slight yellow colour cast.

As for the images #3 is the weakest ans uffers from no eye contact from any of the people IMHO. The other 3 have good appeal, but #1 could have been waaay better if you'd waited a second or too for the foreground person to have walked past. Then you have all that great empty foreground with the strong leading lines down to the people at the end.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Alpha_7 on Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:51 pm

I like this set, just a quick question did you have any issues taking photos at train stations ?

#1 to some extent I agree with Peter that I think the image would of been stronger without the foreground guy and just strong lines to the people in the distance.. (this does contradict the, "you should have foreground interest thing") but for this shot the dude is distracting..

#2 I dont' mind but I find it a bit subdued, which could be what you were after, it looks pretty noisey for ISO 400, did you bring up the exposure when editing ??

#3 Unlike Peter I like this one the most, and dont' think you need eye contact, for me in this shot you are the silent, invisible observer and you get a little insight into the lives of three different people waiting for the train. I kind of like how the to females are as farway from the male as they can be, and none of them really look relaxed. I also like the composition with the horizontal and vertical lines (kind of like a viewfinder grid).

#4 This one works better then #2 (which are similar) as this has more movement, and light, plus a stronger person to draw interest too.


Thanks for sharing.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby ozimax on Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:59 pm

#2 and #4 are common scenes, but I like them all the same. Paints a bleakish picture of waiting for public transport in the cold.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby fishafotos on Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:09 pm

Stubsy,
I don't have a calibrated monitor but these shots were all taken under very yellow lights, the temp was turned down in RAW but it's not all gone.

Alpha,
Thanks heaps for the feedback,
I ran into some trouble the other day when i was taking photos in a tube station, the cops in london are really paranoid about terrorism so they checked my camera (after i showed them how to use it!). But I said I was an aussie and they were fine about it, i'm just not allowed to take them any more (at least not when they can see me!)

It is very noisy for ISO400 but I under-exposed it a couple of stops and had to do alot of brightening in RAW processing.

Cheers for the feedback.

Harry
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste.

http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
User avatar
fishafotos
Member
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:48 am
Location: East Fremantle, W.A - D80


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques