
cheers troy
wedding picModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
wedding piccan anyone give me some advice on how i could have shot this better. also any comments on photoshop tweaking would be appreciated to.
![]() cheers troy
I'd clone out the green thing on the right its distracting from the main focus of the shot. Other then that it looks a little flat (on my uncalibrated screen), and I'm not sure if the WB is spot on, again, not calibrated so I'm merely guessing..
I think framed up tighter and a slightly lower viewpoint may have worked.
Craig Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
i actually printed this 8x10 so lost 2 inchs at the top which made it a bit better. but i do agree it would have been beter if i had have dropped the focus down a bit.
i agree about the getting rid of that green thing. i was fairly rushed and can't remember even shooting this now, or what was going through my head ![]() thanks for the help. cheers troy
Sorry by flat I mean, it lacks a bit of punch, a little tweak of the contrast and saturation, or playing with curves or levels could give the shot a bit of impact. (But no one else seems to have complained so it could just my my LCD I'm using on my end). If you don't mind I've PP'd you shot.. (probably taken it maybe too far, but its to give you and idea of what I meant...) Let me know if you'd rather me take down the pic. ![]() Last edited by Alpha_7 on Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Everyone sees thing different too, so no everyone will like the same picture, of prefer the same processing style, or technique.
thanks for fixing up the pic, i dont mind at all.
the crop is much better and the moving of those people definetly helps. i dont feel your adjustments to the curves or whatever your did where over the top at all, what did you do there anyway? thanks again troy
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|