Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Reschsmooth on Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:03 am
Was at the Fairmont Resort last week for a conference, and had an hour or so to walk to Sublime Point for some photos.
These were taken on f90x, 20mm (at about f16 or so) using Fuji PRO 160S colour film.
Having no idea how to judge distances, I would say that Sublime Point is something like 2km away from Echo Point/3 Sisters.
Given the time of day and position of the sun, I would normally bracket shots like this, but not having a tripod with me nor the MF26 back for the f90x (which provides a bracketing function), I didn't really bracket. I therefore tried to get some detail in both the sky and foreground (which were many stops apart in exposure), but think I lost a lot of detail in the foreground.
C&C most appreciated, particularly in terms of:
1. Does the lack of prominance of the three sisters, given distance,* reduce any impact of these photos?
2. Does the use of the gradient layer in shot 1 add or detract?
3. Does the monochrome conversion work?
4. Generally, do you think there is enough impact to make these good photos? (Given the exposure problems, I sought to increase contrast via curves - wanting opinions on this).
Shot 1
Shot 2 - this is a cropped photo taken at a slightly different time to Shot 1.
Cheers
Patrick
*It's funny how poor punctuation can ruin the context of the question.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by Glen on Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:21 am
Patrick, I find the 3 sisters are not a feature of the first image. I also would say that you have shown other images with a stronger focal point.
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by Reschsmooth on Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:14 am
Thanks Glen - having someone else's opinion can help shape one's own point of view (rightly or wrongly) and I probably agree with you now!
P
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by Alpha_7 on Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:25 am
I didn't even notice the 3 sisters in the first, then saw the second and could make them out, and went back to the first and had to really look to see them.
1. Yes, it does lack prominance
2. Without having an original to compare too, I'm not sure I can comment
3. The Mono of the second does work better then the first which looks (honestly.. pretty wrong, to me)
4. First one, no, second one.. still a no, but had you told me it was taken by your grandfather with his first camera, then I might of said yes.
Sorry if these seems overly harsh, but like Glen I think I've seen a lot better images from your in the past.
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by Reschsmooth on Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:56 am
Thanks Craig - I appreciate the harsh feedback.
I guess one thing I was trying to achieve, given the sillhouetting of that ridge that includes the three sisters, was a very minimalist type landscape shot where the ridgeline was focal point - however, I concede that this was the aim from a PP perspective, not a photographic perspective (ie. when I saw the prints of the exposure, I figured I may as well try to lose all foreground detail and go for the sillhouette).
I don't know if that makes sense, and, either way, it would appear I didn't achieve my objective, which is fair enough - experimentation often includes failure
P
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|