|
Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 by Yi-P on Sun Apr 01, 2007 2:29 am
Somehow I'm quite hooked to building up very large panoramas for no reason. I'm not quite a pixel peeking person but I like the way they are done and the amount of details from it.
This time another over hundred megapixels image. A 130 Mega-pixels image is created through combination of 62 x 4MP overlapping images. Spent approximately 5 hours doing this stitch and correcting the little bugs in between. Most of the time spent was waiting for my computer to respond. With 1GB RAM is not anywhere near to process this shot. Took me overloaded 1GB and plus 1.5GB swap space to do most works in PS.
Here it is, a <5% view of the actual 'finish'...
Im off to sleep for now, will post those 100% crop if anyone want to have a peek. 
C&C needed!
-
Yi-P
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
- Location: Sydney -- Ashfield
-
by surenj on Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:34 am
What a kick ass panorama... The only gripe I would have is the dark fore ground but somehow it seems to add depth to the image...
Did you manually stitch?
Print and sell !!!!
-
surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by wendellt on Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:00 pm
why do we need to buy a phase 1 digial back
when we can now just use your technique
impressive
-
wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by Glen on Sun Apr 01, 2007 2:31 pm
Like it Yip 
-
Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by Geoff on Sun Apr 01, 2007 2:54 pm
Great stuff Yip!
Are u using PSCS2/Pano Factory or some other program?
-
Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
by Cre8tivepixels on Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:34 pm
Nice image..wow alot of time in post!
-
Cre8tivepixels
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 999
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
- Location: Malabar - Sydney
by ozimax on Sun Apr 01, 2007 4:20 pm
Nice image YiP. Would you care to try stitching it on my little iBook G4?... President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
-
ozimax
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5289
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
- Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
by fishafotos on Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:42 pm
wow, cool. Can you put up a 100% crop of it?
Cheers
Harry
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste.
http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
-
fishafotos
- Member
-
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:48 am
- Location: East Fremantle, W.A - D80
-
by Yi-P on Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:50 pm
Thanks for comments
surenj wrote:What a kick ass panorama... The only gripe I would have is the dark fore ground but somehow it seems to add depth to the image...
Did you manually stitch?
Print and sell !!!!
The foreground does have plenty of details as I see on my screen, tho the dominant colours/part is still the city itself as I want it to be. I would love to sell it, but printing this will be a PITA which goes 60inches wide on 300dpi... lol Geoff wrote:Great stuff Yip! Are u using PSCS2/Pano Factory or some other program?
No, I used the freebie called AutoStitch, its very slow, but does what I need. And ofcourse, being part of cheap man not buying a phase-one back and a MF camera or those Zeitz 120MP freebie is always good.  ozimax wrote:Nice image YiP. Would you care to try stitching it on my little iBook G4?
I wouldn't mind if I get a regular pay of PP work for all those hours  fishafotos wrote:wow, cool. Can you put up a 100% crop of it?
I've grabbed a few 100% crops from around the sides/corners of the image:
-
Yi-P
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
- Location: Sydney -- Ashfield
-
by Grev on Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:51 am
I'm shocked by your efforts, kudos.
-
Grev
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:10 pm
- Location: 4109, Brisbane.
-
by Reschsmooth on Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:10 am
Great stuff Yi-P - the detail and work is awesome. My only question is: is it me or does it seem to have a slight lean to the right?
P
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-
Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|
