



Click for larger. C&C welcomed.
NewcastleModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
i'm liking 2 & 3..
2 for the DOF effect, and 3 for the colour and 'wide' feel i get from it ![]() Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Todd,
I like 1, 2, 3 but 4 doesnt float my boat with 3 i would be tempted to clone out the wisp of cloud to the right of the wind mill. i remember driving past this Monday just past, and thought it was strange only having 1 wind mill. The curved energy Australia billboard is also kind of distracting, if you could straighten it without distorting the rest of the image too much. the blue sky looks great. Cheers Laurie
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|