

And of course the old faithful, dump and burn


A few faves from the Avalon airshowModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A few faves from the Avalon airshowC&C welcome
![]() ![]() And of course the old faithful, dump and burn ![]() ![]()
Canon 90-300USM. I think from memory around F5, ISO100
The long end of this lens leaves a bit to be desired, will be sourcing a 400mm by the next airshow I attend (that and you really do need 400mm to get some of the high action shots, 300mm just does not cut it)
Well Cordy I'm most impressed by the apparent sharpness in these shots, even if you find the 90-300 lacking at the long end (lacking sharpness, speed, or a combination of the two?). I do have to ask, are all these shots the full frame, or have you cropped them, as with each I feel like I'd like a little more breathing space between the edge of frame and the subject.
The sharpness on the right hand side of No 2 is fantastic - it reminds me of a Tamiya model aircraft from my distant childhood days! As others have said, a wider crop would be better, I think.
P Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
The lens lacks some sharpness and is definitely not as fast as I would like, to shoot fast jets anyway. There was some pp done to the shots, but not a lot - one USM pass, levels The only shot that is full frame from memory is the 2nd one, the two others are cropped. With aircraft photos I dont like leaving too much "dead space" around the aircraft, but still like to maintain a 6x4 ratio of sorts - its a habit I have gotten into with these style of shots. I can actually see where Canon's IS will help me significantly in creating crisper images and the 100-400mm lens I've been looking at has IS. That and I find it easier to keep a heavier lens steadier, I tend to move a small lens around a bit too rapidly Cheers again, Chris
I'm gonna go the opposite and say i reckon the tight crops are great, number 2 is my pic because of the sharpness and the heat haze.
Quite, its a case of requiring fast AF and shooting continuous. Some of these jets were seriously moving too, 600-700 kts (1000 kmh)
Re: A few faves from the Avalon airshow1 and 2 are outstanding. Makes me want to go to an airshow this year.
Tom(tcsphoto)
http://tcsphoto.smugmug.com/ Join and save http://www.smugmug.com/?referrer=JX9ONDzzLhczc
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|