Footsteps

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Footsteps

Postby Geoff on Sat Apr 14, 2007 5:01 pm

So I was down at the beach early this morning - took this shot, came home and did some simple PP. Is this just 'another' footprint shot, something more or less? I'd be grateful for some feedback on this image. Good, bad or ugly:

Image
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby PiroStitch on Sat Apr 14, 2007 5:26 pm

concept is good but i think what would improve is to shoot at a slightly lower angle and have a bit more DOF so the first maybe 2 foot prints are in focus, then it slowly disappears into the background/horizon.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Killakoala on Sat Apr 14, 2007 7:17 pm

As Piro said, but i feel the sand texture lets it down a bit. Looks like concrete. Too flat and not enough wavy stuff.

Good to see you exploring and experimenting though.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Fortigurn on Sun Apr 15, 2007 2:47 am

I like the sand texture, and agree that a greater DOF would help the shot. Bringing the distant sand into focus might help the overall photo texture.
Fortigurn
Member
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Taipei (Taiwan)

Postby Laurie on Sun Apr 15, 2007 10:21 pm

Perfect DOF. it draws you into the first couple of foot prints, but because the blur (bokeh?) of the other footprints are still visible it draws you away to the top of the frame.
nicely done :)
User avatar
Laurie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Mortdale.Sydney/NSW.AU

Postby spaz on Sun Apr 15, 2007 10:28 pm

I like the texture of the sand, can really imagine the feel of the hard wet stuff :) cool how you can see the different depths within the footsteps through the contrast within each shadow
http://www.50mmprime.com

D70s | 50 1.4 | 85 1.4 | 18-70 | 70-300 ED | Pinhole | SB800

POTW 24.04.07 - thanks Geoff
User avatar
spaz
Member
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: St Ives, Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:47 pm

They look so bloody neanderthal! :shock:
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby colin_12 on Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:32 am

The only thing that bugs me Geof, is the little sprays of sand beside the prints. Difficult to avoid though.
Regards Colin
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Postby Reschsmooth on Mon Apr 16, 2007 10:04 am

Geoff, I like what you have done here. I think, compared to the 'standard' footprint in sand shot, you have found a different kind of sand (compared to the normal golden, smooth sand). I like the DOF.

P
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques