Lone Monk

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Lone Monk

Postby Alex on Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:26 pm

I'm in two minds as to whether I should trash this image or not. I like the idea, but the subject is too far/ insignificant and the whole image looks too contrasty/ busy. I tried to use selective colour (I normally hate it) to emphasize the main subject, but I do not think it works either. Would be good to hear honest thoughts.

Image

Thanks

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Glen on Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:46 pm

Alex, it works for me. The image would only need to be A4 for the monk to really show up. I might be tempted to clone the aerials in the sky out
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Alex on Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:55 pm

Thanks, Glen. Good point about areals, I didn't even notice them till you mentioned. Now they are giving me the sh1ts :-)

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby big pix on Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:01 pm

have you tried a pano crop from just above the shadow on the bridge.....

works for me
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby Alex on Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:03 pm

big pix wrote:have you tried a pano crop from just above the shadow on the bridge.....

works for me


Thanks, John, I tried a pano crop, but the main subject still looks too distant.

Cheers
Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby stubbsy on Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:05 pm

Alex

Don't doubt yourself. The selective colour doesn't work. Stick with the original B & W. If the viewer misses the monk it is their loss. IT's a fine image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Alex on Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:10 pm

 LOL, Thanks Peter. Here is complete B&W version.

Image

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby moz on Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:11 pm

I'd be tempted to clone the monk out :)

Seriously, the colour doesn't work and I think it's a pretty reasonable photo anyway.
http://www.moz.net.nz
have bicycle, will go to Critical Mass
User avatar
moz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:50 pm
Location: Coburg, Melbun.

Postby Alex on Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:15 pm

moz wrote:I'd be tempted to clone the monk out :)

Seriously, the colour doesn't work and I think it's a pretty reasonable photo anyway.


Moz,

Thanks for the honest opition.

Cheers
Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby gstark on Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:17 pm

The colour doesn't work, but I agree with Bernie's pano crop suggestion. He has nailed it.

The monk doesn't need to be dominant; just there.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Alex on Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:24 pm

gstark wrote:The colour doesn't work, but I agree with Bernie's pano crop suggestion. He has nailed it.

The monk doesn't need to be dominant; just there.


Is this better? Thanks for your help.

Image

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Frankenstein on Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:29 pm

I agree that the colour doesn't work. If the monk was larger and more significant, I think the image would be much better. Unfortunately, I keep getting distracted by the vertical pole 1/3 in from the right edge. I think it's one of those situations/images where it's almost there, it has all the right elements, but doesn't quite make it (which accounts for about 99% of my shots :()

Frank
My photo gallery: http://www.frankalvaro.net
>>>> Nikon D300...Nikon 18-200 VR...Sigma 10-20...Tamron 90mm macro <<<<
"I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about. " Peter Griffin
User avatar
Frankenstein
Senior Member
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:23 pm
Location: Ruse (Sydney)

Postby phillipb on Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:32 pm

Alex, you've tried the other suggestions, how about one more.
Try a vertical crop eliminating the tall post on the right. It should put the monk in the rule of thirds position towards the top left.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby Alex on Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:36 pm

phillipb wrote:Alex, you've tried the other suggestions, how about one more.
Try a vertical crop eliminating the tall post on the right. It should put the monk in the rule of thirds position towards the top left.


Thanks Philip,

I think I like your version the best so far.

Image

Cheers
Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Alex on Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:37 pm

Thanks also Frank. Yes, I think this shot is not quite there :-)

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Frankenstein on Fri Apr 27, 2007 10:42 pm

Alex wrote:Thanks also Frank. Yes, I think this shot is not quite there :-)

Alex

the latest version is much better!

Frank
My photo gallery: http://www.frankalvaro.net
>>>> Nikon D300...Nikon 18-200 VR...Sigma 10-20...Tamron 90mm macro <<<<
"I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about. " Peter Griffin
User avatar
Frankenstein
Senior Member
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:23 pm
Location: Ruse (Sydney)


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques