What do you think?




Any comments would be great
Cheers
Harry
Landscapes of the South-WestModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Landscapes of the South-WestI have just come back from spending the weekend down south (of WA) in Eagle Bay, took most of the shots on the way there and back.
What do you think? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Any comments would be great Cheers Harry Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste. http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
1st one is great idea but it lacks a bit of point of interest, I can't find one point to look at here.
#2 is great panorama and treatment, but again its bit dark and lacking some interests. maybe that is your intent, but I can't figure out whats behind the shades (or its just from this small resolution effect). #3 great B&W treatment tones and composition ![]() #4 Again, great stuff on this one!
Hi Harry,
I prefer the 2nd and 4th of this series. The first whilst it's good, as Yip has said lacks 'something'. The 3rd one - the vignetting somehow seems a bit OTT for me. The last one though is definately my favourite here - excellent! Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
I like the last 2. Except I find that the 2nd last is quite dark, especially with vignetting on the edges.
Excellent shots. Alex
Well I actually like #1 - for me the foreground provides that strong focus and then I get that OOF train (or whatever) on the rh which makes me look hard at the image - so it works for me. #4 is the standout though - a strong image and well suited to this well done B & W conversion.
#2 suffers from seeing it at this size I suspect and #3 - where are his feet Harry ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Thanks heaps for the feedback, I had a look at the shots on a different screen and I have reaslised that my monitor is quite bright, that is why a couple of them look so dark, I'll definatley fix that. Some great advice there, I was so annoyed when I cut that guy's feet off, he was giving me weird looks so i left before i got into any trouble. I agree with everyone about #1 too, I'm not sure what, but it just lacks something, I think it is just that the foreground distracts from the lines of the road and the truck.
Just in case anyone was interested, here are a couple of smaller copies of the color versions of the shots. (Sorry about putting them on the same page). ![]() ![]() I also thought I'd put up a link to a slightly bigger version (1200x244) of the panorama shot. It definatley looks better when it is bigger. Here is the link: http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/8772 ... y20ke9.jpg The rest of the shots are in my Smugmug Gallery: http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com/ga ... #145973971 Cheers Harry Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste. http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
Harry your 4th image works equally well in B&W and colour.
![]()
The chop top was actually on purpose (it was a single shot cropped to a pano), but I think you're right about the type of tree. I did another one which i quite liked, it just wasn't as sharp as I would have liked.
![]() Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste. http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|