Landscapes of the South-West

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Landscapes of the South-West

Postby fishafotos on Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:29 pm

I have just come back from spending the weekend down south (of WA) in Eagle Bay, took most of the shots on the way there and back.

What do you think?

Image



Image



Image


Image

Any comments would be great

Cheers
Harry
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste.

http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
User avatar
fishafotos
Member
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:48 am
Location: East Fremantle, W.A - D80

Postby Yi-P on Sat Apr 28, 2007 10:42 pm

1st one is great idea but it lacks a bit of point of interest, I can't find one point to look at here.

#2 is great panorama and treatment, but again its bit dark and lacking some interests. maybe that is your intent, but I can't figure out whats behind the shades (or its just from this small resolution effect).

#3 great B&W treatment tones and composition :)

#4 Again, great stuff on this one!
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Geoff on Sat Apr 28, 2007 11:36 pm

Hi Harry,
I prefer the 2nd and 4th of this series.
The first whilst it's good, as Yip has said lacks 'something'.
The 3rd one - the vignetting somehow seems a bit OTT for me.
The last one though is definately my favourite here - excellent!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Alex on Sat Apr 28, 2007 11:57 pm

I like the last 2. Except I find that the 2nd last is quite dark, especially with vignetting on the edges.
Excellent shots.
Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby stubbsy on Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:37 am

Well I actually like #1 - for me the foreground provides that strong focus and then I get that OOF train (or whatever) on the rh which makes me look hard at the image - so it works for me. #4 is the standout though - a strong image and well suited to this well done B & W conversion.

#2 suffers from seeing it at this size I suspect and #3 - where are his feet Harry :roll:
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby iGBH on Sun Apr 29, 2007 11:20 am

Love the fourth one.

One of the better B&W conversions i've seen where it actually suits the image.
User avatar
iGBH
Member
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 4:39 pm
Location: Eltham, Melbourne

Postby maccab36 on Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:23 pm

#4 B/W gives it the right tone, I don't think the same picture in color would have the same inpact.

Great shot, love the angle.
User avatar
maccab36
Newbie
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 4:38 pm
Location: Nudgee, Brisvegas

Postby fishafotos on Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:00 pm

Thanks heaps for the feedback, I had a look at the shots on a different screen and I have reaslised that my monitor is quite bright, that is why a couple of them look so dark, I'll definatley fix that. Some great advice there, I was so annoyed when I cut that guy's feet off, he was giving me weird looks so i left before i got into any trouble. I agree with everyone about #1 too, I'm not sure what, but it just lacks something, I think it is just that the foreground distracts from the lines of the road and the truck.

Just in case anyone was interested, here are a couple of smaller copies of the color versions of the shots. (Sorry about putting them on the same page).

Image


Image

I also thought I'd put up a link to a slightly bigger version (1200x244) of the panorama shot. It definatley looks better when it is bigger.

Here is the link: http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/8772 ... y20ke9.jpg

The rest of the shots are in my Smugmug Gallery: http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com/ga ... #145973971

Cheers

Harry
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste.

http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
User avatar
fishafotos
Member
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:48 am
Location: East Fremantle, W.A - D80

Postby Glen on Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:05 pm

Harry your 4th image works equally well in B&W and colour. :D I think two just sort of has the wrong tree for that shot. Also a tiny amount of headroom above the tree might help, in the larger version it is even more noticeable about the chopped top.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby fishafotos on Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:43 pm

The chop top was actually on purpose (it was a single shot cropped to a pano), but I think you're right about the type of tree. I did another one which i quite liked, it just wasn't as sharp as I would have liked.



Image
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste.

http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
User avatar
fishafotos
Member
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:48 am
Location: East Fremantle, W.A - D80


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques