Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by W00DY on Tue May 01, 2007 9:58 pm
Hi All,
Some of you may have seen my post in the PP forum well here are 4 more from my day at the beach with my kids.
I really am trying to improve my photography so your honest feedback is appreciated.
Image 1 & 2 - I know there is a lot of "space" but this is what I was going for, I do a lot of tight crops so was looking for something different
Img 3 & 4 - Some of my tight crops
Looking forward to your comments.
Cheers,
W00DY
Andrew Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
-

W00DY
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
- Location: Sydney - Hills District
-
by colin_12 on Wed May 02, 2007 8:48 am
Hi Woody,
I like #1.
I think it would have been better to focus on the hand in #3
#4 looks a little over satuated to me on my work monitor.
Hope my thoughts help.
Regards Colin
-

colin_12
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
- Location: Hazelbrook
by Reschsmooth on Wed May 02, 2007 8:55 am
Hi Woody,
I like the use of space in No 1, although for No 2, I would have composed the photo to have the child at the top of the shot. As it is, she is looking directly out of the shot, making the viewer's eye follow, and thus tending to ignore the rest of the shot - my opinion at least.
I agree with Colin's comments re Nos 3 & 4
Cheers
P
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by sirhc55 on Wed May 02, 2007 10:11 am
Woody - pics 1 and 2 are classic advertising examples of having space for copy and #2 is just superb. I don’t feel as if there is any need to C&C your eye composition - it works. The colours for me work. 
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by W00DY on Wed May 02, 2007 7:03 pm
colin_12 wrote:Hi Woody, I like #1. I think it would have been better to focus on the hand in #3 #4 looks a little over satuated to me on my work monitor. Hope my thoughts help. Regards Colin
Hi Colin,
Thanks for your comments. Yeah, I also thought I shoudl have focused on the hand however I really liked the pattern on her jeans, that is why I had that as the focus point (I have heaps of other images of her sandy hands!!!)
#4 looks ok on my monitor, I might check it at my work tomorrow.
Cheers.
Andrew Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
-

W00DY
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
- Location: Sydney - Hills District
-
by W00DY on Wed May 02, 2007 7:06 pm
Reschsmooth wrote: For No 2, I would have composed the photo to have the child at the top of the shot. As it is, she is looking directly out of the shot, making the viewer's eye follow, and thus tending to ignore the rest of the shot - my opinion at least.
That's a good point, however I wonder what is in the shot other than Sienna that is of interest?
I do agree though, it probably would have been better framed in the top corner.
Andrew Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
-

W00DY
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
- Location: Sydney - Hills District
-
by W00DY on Wed May 02, 2007 7:07 pm
sirhc55 wrote:Woody - pics 1 and 2 are classic advertising examples of having space for copy and #2 is just superb. I don’t feel as if there is any need to C&C your eye composition - it works. The colours for me work. 
Thank Chris. appreciate your comments.
I always love it when someone replies with suggestions re an image and then someone else replies saying they love it... just says a lot about photography
W00DY
Andrew Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
-

W00DY
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
- Location: Sydney - Hills District
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|