Who's That?

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Who's That?

Postby BT*ist on Tue May 08, 2007 9:21 am

I'm not sure whether I prefer the (semi high-key) colour or the (slightly more than semi high-key) Black'n'White?


<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/61147501@N00/488942808/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/195/488942808_3315540003_o.jpg" width="800" height="534" alt="zIMGP0956" /></a>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/61147501@N00/488974715/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/205/488974715_7d67bce72c_o.jpg" width="800" height="534" alt="zbwIMGP0956" /></a>
Pentax istDS+K10D. Pentax 50mm f1.4, Sigma 10-20mm, Tamron 90mm f2.8 macro, Kit Lenses. http://www.redbubble.com/people/berndt2
User avatar
BT*ist
Senior Member
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:38 am
Location: London, United Kingdom

Postby stubbsy on Tue May 08, 2007 9:40 am

Definitely the black and white for me. In the colour the people in the background stand out which distracts me from the legs. In the B & W they vanish (almost)
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Old Bob on Tue May 08, 2007 9:43 am

Out of the two, I like the B/W image best, as the background is not distracting. But that's only me :D

Bob
User avatar
Old Bob
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:18 pm
Location: Parkes NSW

Postby Alex on Tue May 08, 2007 9:50 am

How do you view these? I get 'page not found' message.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue May 08, 2007 9:53 am

I'll go against the early grain and say I like the colour better. Bright happy and cheerful, and I think it makes the legs and the people in the background standout neither of which I mind. For me the people in the background form an intergral part of the picture, sort of the group of them, vs the soul reader in jeans. I like it.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Alex on Tue May 08, 2007 9:56 am

B&W for me.

Alex
    User avatar
    Alex
    Senior Member
     
    Posts: 3465
    Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
    Location: Melbourne - Nikon

    Postby ATJ on Tue May 08, 2007 11:27 am

    I prefer the colour - especially the contrast between the denim and the stone. The colours in the background don't distract me.
    User avatar
    ATJ
    Senior Member
     
    Posts: 3982
    Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
    Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

    Postby sirhc55 on Tue May 08, 2007 11:30 am

    Colour - adds depth and the legs are not lost :)
    Chris
    --------------------------------
    I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
    User avatar
    sirhc55
    Key Member
     
    Posts: 12930
    Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
    Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

    Postby NJ on Tue May 08, 2007 6:56 pm

    B&W for sure with me. i agree with the points made about the coloured people in the background, they detract attention from the main subject. in the B&W ur intention is much clearer.
    Nathan
    D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
    http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
    User avatar
    NJ
    Senior Member
     
    Posts: 712
    Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
    Location: Ringwood, Melbourne


    Return to Image Reviews and Critiques