most of these were taken without the softbox flash off camera naked sb800(hard light) in combination with the very low ambient tungsten light




Something pt2Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Something pt2Forgot to mention 'Something' is Natalie Woods label
most of these were taken without the softbox flash off camera naked sb800(hard light) in combination with the very low ambient tungsten light ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
Is that person supposed to be in the bottom left of #4?
anyway outstanding Photo's one thing there appears to be some noise in the shadows of #4
I admire your skill but personally I prefer your softer lighting set-ups Wendel. This hard edge lighting is too contrasty for these particular images....but that's only my personal taste. The colour arrangements are beautiful!
Regards
Matt. K
hi
thats a tv crew guy hes meant to be in the pic it was pretty dark in there technically i had to take the photo in a way that resulted with lots of noise i tried to use minimum shutter speeds to reduce noise the important things i look for first is subject matter, art direction, and then technical thankyou for comments Matt i understand hard light only suits certain situations in this situation i thought in my judgement a hard light would contrat the pensive fragility of the the scene if i had all day i'd shoot the set a million times over using all the lighting techniques i could muster it really was an inspirational fashion presentation full on fashion editorial material
Always a joy to see your images mate. I was wondering to myself if you were in Fashion Week when I saw it on the news. Glad to see you were.
I like the harsh lighting in these i,ages, I don't think subdued soft light would have served them as well. 2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc
http://www.awbphotos.com.au
Lovely once again, very contrasting style to the other set. I prefer your handling of the softer lighting. Both terrific though. Wendelll out of curiosity what camera and lens set up?
cheers marco
hi
thankyou everyone marco i used my new d200 and the 17-35mm f2.8 i had the d2x with the 85mm but this sort of set required me to shoot wide it was quite tight
Superb images as usual Wendell. Your skill in this area of photography is unsurpassed
![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
Sensational as always, by far and away the most technically proficient tog in this forum!!
Hands down.........just MHO ![]() Dan
Turn your monitor sideways?
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|