Both are 10 shot (portrait) stitched.


Thumbnails to Full Size versions


Panos from the MountainModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Panos from the MountainStill waiting for sunrise so I tried a couple of panos from the top of Wild Horse Mountain.
Both are 10 shot (portrait) stitched. ![]() ![]() Thumbnails to Full Size versions ![]() ![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
Mark,
great details in those panos. Not sure if the sunrise was worth the wait, but the pre-sunrise certainly was worth the drive there. What lens were you using for the doing the pano? cheers, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Beautiful images. The light is fantastic and the fog adds a new dimension.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
thanks Folks
![]() André, it was the Nikkor 85 f/1.4 Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
Mark,
You are putting that lens to a very good use. Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
They are both great. The full size definitely does it justice. So much detail in the trees in the first etc. Love the colours.
I think the first is better ... (the colours are fantastic). Russell
Nikon D700 // 50 1.4 // 70-200 2.8 VRII // 24-120 f4// Tamron 90 // SB-800 // 70-300G I'm on Redbubble too ... http://www.redbubble.com/people/rflower If you can make one of my photos look better and you have the inclination ... please do so.
Mark, I can only say "wow" - great photography.
Frank My photo gallery: http://www.frankalvaro.net
>>>> Nikon D300...Nikon 18-200 VR...Sigma 10-20...Tamron 90mm macro <<<< "I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about. " Peter Griffin
Slider, the first is simply stunning! Well done, beautiful colours and mood. I hope it ends up on your wall!
![]()
Great work Mark. I prefer the 2nd one here, the colour contrast is beautiful. An unusual lens for landscape work but you've done a terrific job with it. Print these for sure!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|