Real or fake?

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Real or fake?

Postby ATJ on Wed Jun 20, 2007 10:02 am

Here are two images that show the wonders of mimicry in nature. The first photograph is of a pufferfish, Canthigaster valentini. As with other members of its family (Tetraodontidae), this fish is toxic due to the tetraodontoxin in its tissues. This is the same toxin in fugu.

Image

The second photograph is of a filefish (basically a leatherjacket) that mimics the puffer. It is not toxic at all. They are almost identical in appearance, other than their fins.

Image

Interestingly, I took these photographs in sequence only minutes apart - well near enough: there was one photograph between them of the mimic which wasn't as good as this one.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby gstark on Wed Jun 20, 2007 10:34 am

That's amazing .... nature never ceases to impress me, and your images only help to keep me intrigued.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby sirhc55 on Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:09 am

Great pics and very informative
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Old Bob on Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:13 am

You are an encyclopaedia of the underworld, Andrew. I am always intrigued by your images, and your knowledge of the subject.

Bob
User avatar
Old Bob
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:18 pm
Location: Parkes NSW

Postby Yi-P on Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:36 pm

Your underwater shots never stop impressing me :D

Thanks for the great infos that I never knew. :)
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Glen on Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:09 pm

I am buggered how you tell the difference! Great images and story, always interesting your posts
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby BT*ist on Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:24 pm

A great duo of photos - easy to see why a predatory fish would probably move on and grab themselves a less risky meal than attempt to try to tell the difference!
Pentax istDS+K10D. Pentax 50mm f1.4, Sigma 10-20mm, Tamron 90mm f2.8 macro, Kit Lenses. http://www.redbubble.com/people/berndt2
User avatar
BT*ist
Senior Member
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:38 am
Location: London, United Kingdom

Postby ATJ on Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:56 pm

Thanks for the comments. I have been passionate about all things marine since I was in my teens and completed a marine biology degree in 1981. I don't work in the field but sometimes wish that I did. I then remember if I did, I wouldn't be able to afford my toys. :lol:


The easiest way to tell them apart is looking at the size and shape of the indicated fins. On the real one it is small and with a narrow base:

Image

On the fake, the fin is long with a base extending most of the way along the back:

Image
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby Glen on Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:23 pm

Andrew, looks easy now you have shown me the difference, but I am sure you would beat me in a 'spot the difference comp' :lol:
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Oneputt on Wed Jun 20, 2007 4:17 pm

I thought I knew a lot about fish, but I have never seen that before. Thank you Andrew. Live and learn.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby Killakoala on Wed Jun 20, 2007 7:26 pm

Amazing thing nature is. :) Thanks for sharing that with us. It's certainly fascinating to see your images. Those tiny seahorses still intrigue me.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby ozimax on Wed Jun 20, 2007 7:32 pm

Wonderful, spectacular, colourful
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby big pix on Wed Jun 20, 2007 7:50 pm

A very good lesson, what you see might not be what it is......

Great Capture
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby Willy wombat on Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:18 pm

Always enjoy your shots ATJ
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby rookie2 on Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:24 pm

I am as good an angler as I am a photographer

.... consequently I have managed to catch both of these on many occasions and never noticed the difference :oops: :oops:

R2
rookie2
Senior Member
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:45 am
Location: Brighton SA

Postby PiroStitch on Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:57 am

love the educational posts ATJ! Either way I try to stay away from any fish :)
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby crackatoea on Thu Jun 21, 2007 5:29 pm

Nice shots and very interesting. What really scares me is what if I caught the first fish and went to eat it thinking it was a leatherjacket, then again the chances of me catching a fish are nonexistant. I'm never eating fish again.
crackatoea
Member
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 5:40 pm
Location: Kanwal, Central Coast, NSW

Postby ATJ on Thu Jun 21, 2007 5:58 pm

crackatoea wrote:What really scares me is what if I caught the first fish and went to eat it thinking it was a leatherjacket, then again the chances of me catching a fish are nonexistant. I'm never eating fish again.

Maximum size of both the pufferfish and the filefish (leatherjacket) is only 10 centimetres. I hope you don't to all the trouble of eating something so small. :lol:
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques