Houses of Parliament, London

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Houses of Parliament, London

Postby Alpha_7 on Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:01 pm

Two different versions of this London Icon, niether really represent the scene as I saw it but given the ordinary weather and light I've tried to spice it up a little, so comments ? Feedback what do you think ?

Thanks,
Craig

Image

Image
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Louie on Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:51 pm

I like what you have done with the first one, shows warmth and cold at the same time.

The second one I didn't like at first because it looked a bit flat and just like typical London weather but it is starting to grow on me now, looks a bit cartoonish.

So my pick is the first one, but overall I'm not much help at all!

Elena :)
User avatar
Louie
Member
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 10:06 am
Location: Hampton East, Melbourne

Postby Yi-P on Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:03 pm

I like the 2nd one with bit nostalgic look on this old city :)
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby stubbsy on Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:15 pm

I actually prefer #2 - has a more English feel to it (bleak and cold). I'd adjust curves slightly though for a touch more contrast
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Oz_Beachside on Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:16 pm

did they relocate Big Ben to Piza? :wink:

I like the treatment as a photo, but I dont like them. You have sucked the sandstone color out of a very golden colored building... :(

Perhaps bring back a little yellow. And maybe dodge on the light beaming through the hollow under the bridge, just doesnt match the building lights exposure above the bridge.
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby methd on Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:13 pm

Saw your signature, so couldn't help myself.... whacha reckon...

Image
User avatar
methd
Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC.

Re: Houses of Parliament, London

Postby young_einstein on Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:44 pm

Alpha_7 wrote:Two different versions of this London Icon


Are they both processed from the same original shot???
young_einstein
Member
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:17 pm
Location: Caroline Springs, Melbourne

Re: Houses of Parliament, London

Postby Alpha_7 on Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:50 pm

young_einstein wrote:
Alpha_7 wrote:Two different versions of this London Icon


Are they both processed from the same original shot???

Both are from the same HDR image (just different tonal maps for each).

Methd - Thanks for having a play with it, I'm not sure if it works for me, its a bit too fluro.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby young_einstein on Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:51 pm

Which software?
young_einstein
Member
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:17 pm
Location: Caroline Springs, Melbourne

Postby Alpha_7 on Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:55 pm

Photomatix Pro - I highly recommend it, it's a great tool I'm having a lot of fun playing with it, and getting results I can't get straight out of camera.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby the foto fanatic on Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:01 am

Oz_Beachside wrote:did they relocate Big Ben to Piza? :wink:


I guess this is a reference suggesting that "the horizon is not straight".

It's an interesting exercise - test the vertical lines of the Big Ben tower (I just did this in Lightshop) and you'll find that it is dead vertical.

I think there are several visual elements that trick the eye into thinking that the picture may not be level:
- the photographer is not square to the bridge;
- the bridge isn't horizontal; it rises towards the centre;
- there is some lens distortion at the edge of the pic that is causing the building on the far LHS to "lean in".

This is a common dilemma faced by photographers, especially if using a wide-angle lens - which element of my picture do I want to be horizontal/vertical?

Sometimes, as in this case, it is impossible to get everything square unless you use the free transform ability of Photoshop.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby gstark on Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:41 am

Trevor,

cricketfan wrote:Sometimes, as in this case, it is impossible to get everything square unless you use the free transform ability of Photoshop.


They've taken that away from me ... I'm only allowed three crayons at the one time now, and only a plastic spoon. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby sirhc55 on Sun Jul 15, 2007 12:03 pm

Craig - I like both :)
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby ATJ on Sun Jul 15, 2007 12:16 pm

I prefer the second one as it is more a representation of how the buildings actually appear.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby rokkstar on Tue Jul 17, 2007 5:20 am

I like number 2 Craig - :wink: The processing is more to my taste although 1 seems closer to what it looks like to me.

Tell me you went the other side of the bridge though and got it in all its glory?
:)
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue Jul 17, 2007 5:24 am

rokkstar wrote:I like number 2 Craig - :wink: The processing is more to my taste although 1 seems closer to what it looks like to me.

Tell me you went the other side of the bridge though and got it in all its glory?
:)


Sadly Matt no I didn't, I do have some other shots though that I will get around to processing, I didn't even think not to have the bridge in it (derrr).
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques