DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
CandidsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Candids
Still practicing with the 70-200 IS, a few candid shots from a family lunch today:
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Lovely photos - the first one is great.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Sheish Max! WOW! These are terrific! My ONLY comment would be that no.1 seems a little TOO sharp for the content. Have u done any PP USM or sharpening of any sorts? For childhood/baby portraiture soft(er) isn't always a bad thing. The 2nd one is also good, but the woman holding the baby doesn't look impressed, maybe she's tired but imagine if she'd have been smiling a 'proud' smile? Magic!
The 3rd one - good again but what aperture did you use here? Looks a little too narrow for my preferences as HIS left eye seems to the the only focal point.. I've been overly critical but push your boundaries and you will only leap forward in your abilities! Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Thanks all for the comments, especially yours Geoff. Yes, I agree the 1st is most probably a tad too sharp, it was sharpened but most probably no need to do so. These pro lens are in many ways too sharp but I suppose it's better to be too sharp and then soften things a little in PS.
The second is my daughter carrying her little cousin around for about an hour and was most probably getting sick of me taking photos, but comments acknowledged in any case! I think the 3rd was at 2.8 for a bit of variation and you're right, the depth of field is razor thin. Some like it, some don't. I do like these type of shots. (Anyone have a 135 F2 that I could borrow permanently?  )
Thanks again for the comments all. Ozi President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
