Head Shot Help

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Head Shot Help

Postby Laurie on Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:35 am

I offered my services to my dad who is on the board for the golf club we play at. they have a wall with head shots of the members of the board along with their names, and position on the board. the current shots look like they were taken with a P&S, printed on a 10 yr bubble jet!!!

I did some very, very quick sample shots for the golf club manager to look at and they didn't turn out as i would have hoped.
these were taken with 50mm, Sb800 pointed straight up with LSJP.II attached (no inverted dome) WB set to Flash (I think). no PP done at all!
Image


Image

Next time I will have a tripod & will be able to frame the shots a bit better, basically they want to at least see the embroidery on the blazer pocket.
The main thing I am worried about is the shadow to the right of his head and under his nose.
I only have the equipment in my sig available.

Any help would be greatly appreciated

Cheers
Laurie
User avatar
Laurie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Mortdale.Sydney/NSW.AU

Postby Reschsmooth on Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:54 am

It could be my crappy work monitor, but the WB seems a little warm.

Firstly, move your dad further away from the wall. This will soften the shadows behind him or eliminate them altogether.

On my monitor, the walls look a creamy colour - is that correct? If, in fact, they are white, then if you can find a white corner wall - behind and to his right, you can bounce the SB800 into the ceiling corner to give some side and top lighting.

Also, watch out for the detail - his right shirt collar is tucked into the jacket collar - I know this is a trial, but practice now to make spotting these minor things a habit :D

Incidentally, the shadow under his nose is not necessarily a problem (again, as far as I can tell on my monitor) - it is a result of having the main light source directly at the model's front and slightly above head level. Generally called butterfly lighting because of the shadow caused under the nose (others will correct me if I am wrong).
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby Oz_Beachside on Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:02 am

just a thought, if this is a golf glub, why shoot against a boring wall?

perhaps with a longer focal length (closer to 85mm), but not essential, shoot on a cloudy day, early morning (as golfers do) with thier prize green, or fairway as the backdrop. Not to feature the grass, but contextualise the shot, as members of the club. That would complement the desire to capture the logo well.

as said above, move then say a meter away from the wall (until the shadow fades/softens/disappears).
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby Laurie on Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:23 pm

Reschsmooth wrote:It could be my crappy work monitor, but the WB seems a little warm.

Firstly, move your dad further away from the wall. This will soften the shadows behind him or eliminate them altogether.

On my monitor, the walls look a creamy colour - is that correct? If, in fact, they are white, then if you can find a white corner wall - behind and to his right, you can bounce the SB800 into the ceiling corner to give some side and top lighting.

Also, watch out for the detail - his right shirt collar is tucked into the jacket collar - I know this is a trial, but practice now to make spotting these minor things a habit :D

Incidentally, the shadow under his nose is not necessarily a problem (again, as far as I can tell on my monitor) - it is a result of having the main light source directly at the model's front and slightly above head level. Generally called butterfly lighting because of the shadow caused under the nose (others will correct me if I am wrong).


yes WB is fairly off, the wall is cream and thanks for the point about moving him away from the wall, I had it in my mind that closer meant less shadow!
Thanks

Oz_Beachside wrote:just a thought, if this is a golf glub, why shoot against a boring wall?

perhaps with a longer focal length (closer to 85mm), but not essential, shoot on a cloudy day, early morning (as golfers do) with thier prize green, or fairway as the backdrop. Not to feature the grass, but contextualise the shot, as members of the club. That would complement the desire to capture the logo well.

as said above, move then say a meter away from the wall (until the shadow fades/softens/disappears).


I dont have 85mm (though i would love to), and I cant see us getting onto the golf course to take photos, it would be a great idea and I will put it to my dad and see what happens.

though i still have questions regarding what settings to use, both on the camera and on the flash. which mode should i use? when ever i set it for Aperture and set it at about 5 or 6 the shutter drops to below 1 second!
which settings should i use to get the sharpest and brightest image??
cheers
User avatar
Laurie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Mortdale.Sydney/NSW.AU

Postby gstark on Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:34 pm

Laurie wrote:when ever i set it for Aperture and set it at about 5 or 6 the shutter drops to below 1 second!


That's because the camera thinks you're metering in A mode, using the available light.

Which you're not.

Set the camera to M, 1/125, f/5.6 or f/8, and see where that takes you.

As noted above, locate your subject further from the background, and take note of the colours of the walls and ceiling, as, especially if you're bouncing the flash, these can have an effect on the outcome.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby mattyjacobs on Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:45 pm

mate, you've got pocket wizards! some of the stuff on strobist.com has blown me away - overpowering daylight with some flashes/a flash, something to reflect light and pocket wizards, kind of like this shot can make interesting profile photos.

low angles, out on the green in the full golfing kit (with blazer of course) could be really interesting.

but then, being a golf club, they may be into the big conservative thing, and just want straight profile shots.
User avatar
mattyjacobs
Member
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 2:54 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby Laurie on Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:54 pm

mattyjacobs wrote:mate, you've got pocket wizards! some of the stuff on strobist.com has blown me away - overpowering daylight with some flashes/a flash, something to reflect light and pocket wizards, kind of like this shot can make interesting profile photos.

low angles, out on the green in the full golfing kit (with blazer of course) could be really interesting.

but then, being a golf club, they may be into the big conservative thing, and just want straight profile shots.


I, unfortunately, have not mastered the pocket wizards yet, and I think I need another SB800 to take advantage of them and maybe make them into more studio lights.

I spoke with my dad who said they just want straight profile shots, plain background and all.
User avatar
Laurie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Mortdale.Sydney/NSW.AU

Postby mattyjacobs on Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:59 pm

Laurie wrote:I spoke with my dad who said they just want straight profile shots, plain background and all.


fair enough!

Laurie wrote:I, unfortunately, have not mastered the pocket wizards yet, and I think I need another SB800 to take advantage of them and maybe make them into more studio lights.


I'm far from mastering photography, let alone mastering off-camera flash! though even playing with one off-camera flash is fun, bouncing it off a wall etc.

EDIT: just a thought - this strobist.com post shows how off-camera lighting and 'specular highlight controlling' can make far more effective 'profile' shots. Scroll down to see a nice example.

Also, if you look through the drop-down list in 'Lighting 102 Archive', you'll find some helpful articles there.
User avatar
mattyjacobs
Member
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 2:54 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques