
I would appreciate C&C.
Most shots wide open with high ISO [anyone keen to buy me a D3?] to capture available light.

It's a shame Alicia had just closed her eyes in this one...

With nan (or "Omi" in German)


Recent shots of AlexModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Recent shots of AlexMaybe not of the same style as Wendell's recent NYFW posts
![]() I would appreciate C&C. Most shots wide open with high ISO [anyone keen to buy me a D3?] to capture available light. ![]() It's a shame Alicia had just closed her eyes in this one... ![]() With nan (or "Omi" in German) ![]() ![]() Last edited by Reschsmooth on Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:20 am, edited 2 times in total.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Sorry Patrick, photos not showing up for me.
On the subject of Wendell's in view of the current guidelines for titles, I was trying to workout what NYFW was before opening his thread, I thought maybe he had mispelled NSFW ![]() ![]() __________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
hmm, not sure why you can't view the photos - I had previously password-protected the smugmug gallery of Alex photos, but I since took that off. Since then, other photos had been viewable.
Anyone else having problems? Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
how about now?
![]() Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Still not there, maybe smugmug is faulty.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Hmmm...not here either Patrick.
I will try and post some photos from smuggy later, as a test. Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Mick's got that magic touch.
Nothing here either, Patrick. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
The most number of responses I get to tell me the post didn't work.
![]() ![]() I have uploaded the photos to flickr so they should work now. Please let me know? Thanks Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
For those of you who cannot see them:
1st pic is a B&W of Alex sucking on his fist with OOF Alicia in the BG.. 2nd pic is a cute colour one with Alex on Alicia's shoulder/upper arm, again Alicia is OOF but this one has Alex looking more to the camera....
Thanks Mick
![]() Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
![]() ![]() ![]() Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|