Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by surenj on Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:00 am
This is a great location! It really sings in high tide >1.4m. My photos don't really do it any justice. I struggled alot with various issues including composition. I was quite pre-occupied with staying safe after almost getting washed away in a large wave. Yeah yeah....excuses excuses... Hint for people who wear scooba booties. Never remove them once they are wet. You can't get them on again! As usual for your critique. I have played somewhat with the color balance.    
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by spesh on Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:27 pm
Loving the third photo but great job all round  The lines, softness of water and colour are fantastic
-
spesh
- Member
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:24 pm
- Location: Adelaide
-
by biggerry on Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:55 pm
surenj wrote:This is a great location! It really sings in high tide >1.4m. on a day where the swell is really pounding I reckon it would be awesome, but probably a little difficult to get close to the water  I will keep this location in mind when the weather turns crap, its so easy to get to! surenj wrote:I struggled alot with various issues including composition. I was quite pre-occupied with staying safe after almost getting washed away in a large wave. Yeah yeah....excuses excuses...
I am bringing you a tether and a life jacket next time  I think its a side ploy to eventually get your camera wet so you have to upgrade  The horizon on teh first two is alittle off, but that first one is quite good, alittle wider for some more context would have been good but still nice anyway! I like #2, the colours here are quite pleasant, thats also a good composition, one that can only be achieved by getting wet feet - well done. I would go for the symmetry about teh horizon tho, maybe give it a bit more space on top and crop a bit off teh bottom? #3 is also very tidy, it is quite a good representation of the scene on the day, teh colours match teh conditions on the day. I quite like teh way the fence leads up into that little collection of waterfalls, subtle but nice  A fraction more on the right hand side might have helped this. on a side note, I wish that chain was still up on teh fence makes for a much better subject. Last one is a good choice for BW but would go more contrast to get those whites in the flowing water to a true white.
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by biggerry on Wed Aug 11, 2010 11:24 pm
biggerry wrote:Last one is a good choice for BW but would go more contrast to get those whites in the flowing water to a true white.

-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by ozczecho on Thu Aug 12, 2010 12:38 am
Last two are fantastic. Love how the posts walk my eyes through the image.
-

ozczecho
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 785
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
- Location: Beecroft, Sydney
by Big V on Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:33 pm
Number three is great - really like the chain on the wood and the overall colour in this
Canon
-

Big V
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2301
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 am
- Location: Adelaide
by aim54x on Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:49 pm
I like the last one, the black and white looks really good, Gerrys redo with more contrast looks awesome!
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by surenj on Fri Aug 13, 2010 12:33 am
Thanks to everyone who commented. biggerry wrote:I am bringing you a tether and a life jacket next time I think its a side ploy to eventually get your camera wet so you have to upgrade
Well I'd hate to change camps...  I am waiting for the next high ISO performer... If I lose this camera, I'd have to hunt down a 40D. biggerry wrote:on a side note, I wish that chain was still up on teh fence makes for a much better subject.
Dude we can just adjust it next time we are there. Some wise crack removed it I reckon. It wasn't locked or anything...just tangled. biggerry wrote:I would go for the symmetry about teh horizon tho, maybe give it a bit more space on top and crop a bit off teh bottom?
Hmm will have a go. biggerry wrote:Last one is a good choice for BW but would go more contrast to get those whites in the flowing water to a true white.
Love your edit Gerry. Thanks very much for taking the time to do it. I think I might have a go at printing this one.. Maybe have one more attempt to see whether I can improve on the sky. etc You know what... I think I have found at least one solution to my horizon woes. My monitor was at an angle all this time!! ozczecho wrote:Love how the posts walk my eyes through the image.
Thanks ozczecho, this place is ripe for various compositions! aim54x wrote:I like the last one, the black and white looks really good, Gerrys redo with more contrast looks awesome! 
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|