| 
 Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
  
	
		
			Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
		
	 
	
		
		
			Forum rules 
			Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
  Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
  Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
  Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
		
		 
	 
	
		
		
			
			
			 by ozimax on Sat Apr 19, 2014 5:22 pm  
			
            I don't have much time to photographise at the moment, but this morning a short stroll in the Botanic Gardens in Coffs yielded a few quick shots. The X-T1 is a joy to shoot. The camera comes with a little clip on flash, but I can't see myself ever using it. The X-trans sensor's ability to override darkish areas in the face without flash is astonishing. It certainly has some magic to it, including the great Fuji colours. Sad and happy.  Wedding1 by  Ozimax, on Flickr (I have no idea who these people were, but when there's a wedding taking place, my camera will be working.     ) My ever patient  model  DSCF0922bw1 by  Ozimax, on Flickr And again  DSCF0390bw1 by  Ozimax, on Flickr  
                  
            President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse) Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32) 
		 
		
			
			- 
				
  
				ozimax
			 
			- Senior Member
 
		-  
 
		- Posts: 5289
 - Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
 - Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
 
		 
	
		
		 
	 
	 
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 by Matt. K on Sat Apr 19, 2014 6:45 pm  
			
            Seriously, I don't think a camera needs to be any better than this. There's enough detail in those images to make huge prints, (my old D300 images were blown up to the size of a barn door and looked good. The Fuji easily has more quality and more  pixels than the Nikon). I guess the question is how good are the mechanics. Is the camera responsive and user friendly. Is the focus fast. Given that it fits the user then it's going to be successful in the market. 
                  
            Regards
 
 Matt. K 
		 
		
			
			- 
				
  
				Matt. K
			 
			- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
		-  
 
		- Posts: 9981
 - Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
 - Location: North Nowra
 
		 
	
		
		 
	 
	 
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 by PiroStitch on Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:19 am  
			
            The first one is just lovely and spot on. 
                  
            
		 
		
			
			- 
				
  
				PiroStitch
			 
			- Senior Member
 
		-  
 
		- Posts: 4669
 - Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
 - Location: Hong Kong
 
			- 
				
			
 
		
		 
	
		
		 
	 
	 
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 by ozimax on Fri Apr 25, 2014 7:24 pm  
			
            Matt. K wrote:Seriously, I don't think a camera needs to be any better than this. There's enough detail in those images to make huge prints, (my old D300 images were blown up to the size of a barn door and looked good. The Fuji easily has more quality and more  pixels than the Nikon). I guess the question is how good are the mechanics.  
 Mechanics are excellent. It just works. The multiplicity of dials, once learned, makes for easy changing of settings. I especially use the S/CH dial frequently. With kids, I often switch between single shot and multi shot  mode, and this makes things easy-peasy. The face detection is great, even with groups of many people, although not as amazingly good as the Olympus E-M1. The feel of the camera is superb. The 56mm is a reasonably heavy lens but it matches the feel/weight well. Shooting with the little 35mm attached is wonderful. The shutter button is great, the sound fine. The D-Pad on the back is oft criticized and fair enough too. I think I'm used to it now and it doesn't bother me. The tilting screen is very handy, although like most screen these days, it is so good that the images are never quite the same once they are loaded onto a non-retina laptop. The SD card door has been criticized as too easy to open, but I haven't found that to be the case. The camera is weather sealed, but I don't believe there are any Fuji X series lens that are sealed. To be honest, I've never been too worried about a little bit of water on any camera. (I used to wade into chest deep surf with my old D70.) Matt. K wrote:Is the camera responsive and user friendly. 
 It's a doddle to use. The buffer never seems full and blasts away, when needed, at 8fps. And although I'm used to Fuji menus, newcomers to Fuji cameras may find things differently.  Matt. K wrote:Is the focus fast. 
 Focus is not DLSR or even Olympus fast. The E-M1 is instant, but the X-T1 is fast enough, miles faster than the X-Pro1 which admittedly is a bit slow. However, speed of focus is not everything. When the X-T1 locks on, it's good. All in all, the X-T1 is one fun camera and a joy to use, and in my book, that's what photography is all about.  
                  
            President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse) Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32) 
		 
		
			
			- 
				
  
				ozimax
			 
			- Senior Member
 
		-  
 
		- Posts: 5289
 - Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
 - Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
 
		 
	
		
		 
	 
	 
	
	
	 
	Return to Image Reviews and Critiques 
	
	 |