Gave up on lightning /\/!

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Gave up on lightning /\/!

Postby Nosh on Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:34 am

Hi everyone,

With all the stormy weather and trying to capture lightning with a tiny Canon A85 Powershot, I assure you, can be frustrating. However got a moment of some nice light.

No PS used except for resizing the image, and removing a power cable from the top corner.

http://images1.fotopic.net/?iid=ydvc61&outx=600&noresize=1&nostamp=1

Look forward to the comments.
Nosh
Member
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Hurstville, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:40 am

Nice capture, I find even with my D70 the lightning can be literally very hit and miss. I'm not sure on the limitations of your camera but I would assume it woudl increase the level of difficulty on capturing good lightning shots. However it doesn't seem to have problems with a nice sunset
I like the silloeutte of the tree and perhaps if you could bring it out a little more against the dark part of the sky it would help.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Nosh on Wed Nov 30, 2005 12:01 pm

Thanks Craig.

My camera is just a point and shoot compact Canon. But that said, it does have nice results. Obviously not as fast as the D70 and hence I do miss out on the lightning.

Currently looking to buy a D70 if I can get my hands on one.
Nosh
Member
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Hurstville, Sydney

Postby Aussie Dave on Wed Nov 30, 2005 12:58 pm

This just goes to prove that it's the person behind the camera that makes the difference.

May I also suggest, if you haven't already tried, using a long shutter speed, say 2 to 10 seconds. You'll need to be extremely lucky to time your shutter release with the lightning flash, if you're using faster shutter speeds than what I have suggested. Anticipating when the lightning will strike is virtually impossible....

Of course, if your Canon P&S doesn't have shutter speeds this slow, you may need to work on your reflexes :lol: :lol: :lol:
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby kipper on Wed Nov 30, 2005 1:09 pm

Aussie Dave actually when is fairly predicatable, it's just where is the hard bit :)

Well it is fairly predictable when an electrical storm is happening and you can time the intervals between strikes.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby Aussie Dave on Wed Nov 30, 2005 1:19 pm

kipper wrote:Aussie Dave actually when is fairly predicatable, it's just where is the hard bit :)

Well it is fairly predictable when an electrical storm is happening and you can time the intervals between strikes.


that's interesting info Kipper. Would it be predictable to within 1/2 a second (or less), I wonder ?? If one were trying to shoot at speeds faster than a second, you'd want to hope the timing was very continous.

...and then there's the "where" part, as you've mentioned. I guess that's why great lightning shots are always very impressive.
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques