
How are you meant to be able to spot meter on a moving subject!?



Airborne CombatModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Airborne CombatThis is a sequence of images (heavily) cropped that I took at Dee Why beach yesterday... I know they are quite technically imperfect, (blown and not the sharpest)... but I thought I might as well post them
![]() How are you meant to be able to spot meter on a moving subject!? ![]() ![]() ![]() New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Nice Scott, as you said technically they aren't great, but they tell the story and capture the moment well. So what was the final outcome, did the first make off with all the bread ?
As far as I could tell
![]() New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
I generally dont spot meter on flying birds that are likely to be flying erratically,
I usually use centre weighed though, I generally find flying birds to be relatively small in the frame and tend to get better exposed shots. In side by side tests with the d70 I found a tendency to underexpose birds especially when the sky was bright, Aperture priority will usually be the best bet expecially if the bird is flying across varying lighting positions. I try to use fill flash also. exposure compensation may be necessary also, depending on the colour of the birds. Early morning light is usually the sweetest for bird photography with late arvo being the next best. Around midday the light will be harsh. Seagulls are a good source of practice for bird flight shots because they are common and used to man and often come around to steal chips etc. Also, because they are bright white you can get a feel for what exposure compensation is necessary. Steve
I usually position myself with the sun facing behind me and manually set the exposure and leave it as I've had too many instances of birds moving and the sensor not being position correctly so exposures differ between frames.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Darryl, I quite often do the same, but there are times where I want to get something that goes where I dont want it and then I have lost shots whilst I changed exposure.
those are the times I cop the difference in exposure. steve
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|