Page 1 of 1
This can't be right?
Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:29 pmby Matt. K
I snapped this image on Sunday in Hyde Park with the 80-200mm lens. Look at the guys left foot! It can't be that big, surely. It's not likely that the lens has distorted the image? Perhaps just a weird perspective?
Or just big feet?
http://www.pbase.com/matt_k/image/37269309
Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:45 pmby Killakoala
yep, that is a very big foot........
bush fire brigade ...
Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:50 pmby christiand
Back in Kraut Land (that's where I come from) we used to say,
they (big feet) are extremely useful for stomping (stamping ?) out fires.
Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:50 pmby fozzie
You know what they say about men with big feet...................big shoes
Cheers.
Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:52 pmby BBJ
Hi Matt. Well big feet alright i think someone has been playing with
PS. The right foot looks to be on more of an angle and a bit out of proprtion.LOL
but looks different.
Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:56 pmby Matt. K
BBJ
The image has not been distorted in Photoshop. The out of camera perspective has not been changed. It is just a strange image in that the foot looks too big.
Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:59 pmby sirhc55
That’s one helluva hysterical foot. . .
Chris
Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 8:04 pmby gstark
Ian Thorpe?
Someone better call a toe truck.
Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 8:10 pmby BBJ
Ok Matt, I thought it had been played with a bit, yeh well wonder where ge gets his shoes???
LOL
Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 8:34 pmby Raydar
I bet his kids don’t play up!!!!
One kick in the butt with that sucker & it’s all over
Cheers
Ray
Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 8:40 pmby Matt. K
Oh Gary! .....so sublime.
Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 9:36 pmby Greg B
I have a gay friend in Sydney who would like an introduction.....
Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 9:44 pmby bago100
Could it be a lead foot?
Email it to Fergie
Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 10:44 pmby sirhc55
Matt
You would’nt be pulling our leg (foot) would you?
Chris
Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 11:06 pmby Onyx
Working on discovering the Loch Ness Monster "Nessie" now that you've found Bigfoot?!
Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 11:54 pmby Nnnnsic
Looks like there's a bit of elongation just from the way it's shot, but otherwise, yes, he has big feet.
Posted:
Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:16 amby dooda
Wow, you should be able to make millions off of this photo.
You didn't notice these feet when you took the photo? Looks like the other foot (judging by the toe) is just as large. Too bad there isn't a clear shot of his hands. I knew a fellow who was a little below average in size, but had the most enormous hands and feet. It looked like he was wearing baseball gloves or something.
Posted:
Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:09 pmby Matt. K
sirhc55
No. This a genuine image. I was simply struck by the perceived size of the feet after I opened the image in
PS. The guy didn't look unusual when I took the image...I was thinking how he looked like Max Dupains "the sunbather" and grabbed a couple of quick shots.
Posted:
Thu Dec 09, 2004 11:11 pmby sirhc55
Well ytou know what they say ”big feet - little - - - - -”
Chris
Posted:
Thu Dec 09, 2004 11:50 pmby Nnnnsic
sirhc55 wrote:Well ytou know what they say ”big feet - little - - - - -”
Chris
"big feet - little" patience for people who constantly talk about how big feet are, I mean seriously, they're just feet...
Where's the anecdote for big noses?