
Polar Bear ProfileModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Polar Bear ProfileOne from our visit to Seaworld today. I know it's a bit soft around the muzzle but he was jumping around so much I was just happy to get the shot. The backlighting is from the dipping afternoon sun. Comments appreciated.
![]() Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Okay - 55 views and not one reply. Even for me that's something of a record. I know it's not a good shot but it would be great if I could get some ideas as to how I could either fix it or get it right next time.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Gee Simon, you only gave us 15 minutes to digest it
![]() ![]() Critique: I can appreciate how hard it was to get the pic, but the end result (to me) doesn't quite reflect that effort. If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
i have no idea how to fix it
![]() [but i did reply ] ![]() Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
Simon IMO the image lacks critical sharpness. Secondly it seems a little dull and lack 'punch'/contrast. Thirdly, I'd be tempted to try spot metering off the bear's coat to obtain an exposure i imagine might be closer to the real thing(could be wrong here though as I'm imaging the polar bear to be a little whiter, and I know their coat does go yellowish). Fourthly I think the image as in most animal portraits with impact there is good eye contact. The portrait composition doesn't seem to work in this case, unlike say a lion or lioness focussed on its quarry say
![]() ![]() cheers marco
Thanks John - but it was actually 2 days and 15 minutes before I decided to bump it. Image first posted Jan 7. ![]()
Thanks Shane - appreciate you stopping by anyway!
Thanks Marco - it is helpful. I did try to spot metre but I may have missed the mark. The bears are very rarely white in these situations because they reflect the light that's around them. In pristine arctic wilderness they show up all bright and white but when they have grey walls and dark water around them then their coats look really washed out. This is also due to the fact that their skin is actually black and their fur is clear. Colour is always a hassle with them! Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Hi Simon,
Knowing how hard it is to get any shot of a Polar Bear at Seaworld (due to their enclosure, their habits and a million other things) I can appreciate the effort to get it, but the photo just comes across as a snapshot really, rather than really grabbing me. (And there's nothing wrong with those images, but I can't find anything to really critique if you get my drift). Canon 20D and a bunch of lovely L glass and a 580EX. Benro tripod. Manfrotto monopod. Lowepro and Crumpler bags. And a pair of Sigma teleconverters, and some Kenko tubes. http://www.dionm.net/
Just give it a contrast boost and a bit more brightness and you'll have a winner.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Simon,
If you're using spot metering here, rem,ember to take into account the fact that the subject appears to be white, and that your camera's meter will be seeing something that it's trying to assess as being overly bright. As such, the standard meter reading will tend to underexpose, and you will need to compensate for this before making the exposure. Add 0.7 - 1.0 stops of exposure compensation, and then play with your contrast and brightness settings and see what happens. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Nothing like coming along after everyone else has had their say.
I see two problems with the image: - it doesn't engage the viewer enough. Others have mentioned wanting to see the bear's eyes, or wanting it to be looking at the lens. Whatever, I think it needs a tad more interest. - I agree with Gary in that it looks underexposed, and I think if you reprocess with more light and contrast you would see an improvement. Must be the dickens to capture these things while they are roaring around! TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
I stopped
![]() Rel Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Thanks everyone for some very helpful comments. I've got some other shots of this fellow that have him looking into the lens so I'll play with the exposures on those and see if I can make a more interesting image.
Thanks again! ![]() Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|