Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by blacknstormy on Mon Jan 09, 2006 2:00 pm
80-200 with 1.7 TC handheld..... it was never going to work, but what the hell.
Hare at dusk - taken in the middle of a paddock from the car, with the sun streaming from behind the hare.
Willy wagtail on a barbwire fenceline, with shallow DOF
And finally, a swan running across a lagoon near Ipswich
I know - stupid idea, but had to see if I could do it..... turns out I can't 
-

blacknstormy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
- Location: Ipswich Qld
-
by Manta on Mon Jan 09, 2006 2:18 pm
Okay.. now put the nice lens down and step back slowly.
The worse thing is that I just can't put my finger on why these shots aren't as appealing as your normal stuff Rel. You know I'm your biggest fan but somehow these shots just don't work for me. They're not bad, just not as good as they may have been. Sorry if this makes no sense...
It's probably something about composition, DOF and sharpness not wanting to play well together with that lens/TC combination.
-

Manta
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
-
- Posts: 3815
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
- Location: Hamilton Qld
-
by Manta on Mon Jan 09, 2006 2:28 pm
Just to be sure - you better give me the lens. I'll make sure you don't stray again.

-

Manta
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
-
- Posts: 3815
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
- Location: Hamilton Qld
-
by moggy on Mon Jan 09, 2006 5:26 pm
Hi Rel, some thoughts on the shots: I think there should be more space between the post and the hare, maybe a bit more sky above the bird and the swan is great.
 Bob.
.
-

moggy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Castle Hill, Sydney. - Fixed D70s
by Slider on Mon Jan 09, 2006 7:00 pm
Rel, I think 1 and 2 may be oversharpened a little?
I really like the 2nd shot. The limnited DOF works a treat 
-

Slider
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld
-
by MCWB on Mon Jan 09, 2006 7:17 pm
Rel,
I actually really like 2, with the exception of the left third. Cropping this off leaves a wonderfully arty exercise in depth of field. Just like Leigh's POTW from a while ago showed, it doesn't have to be in focus and sharp to be a good picture (well, one some people see as good anyway)!
-

MCWB
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2121
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
- Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70
by blacknstormy on Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:24 pm
Thanks guys
Moggy - I agree, but I couldn't move the hare, and didn't have a gun with me (only kidding), will try with more above the bird, and the swan is ok. I think it was an immature, with the amount of noise it was making as it was running across the lagoon
Slider - only very minimal pp work - was some kind of weird effect from the way I took the shot - I don't think I'll handhold that combination again  And the wagtail was following me around on the fence line, begging for his shot to be taken, so I obliged
MCWB - I agree - had a look without the left third, and does look better .... might have another go at it
Thanks guys - I was fully expecting these shots to be totally canned, you've made my day
(but you all always do  )
Rel
-

blacknstormy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
- Location: Ipswich Qld
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|