
Moon from Mt GambierModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Moon from Mt GambierHere it is through the telescope. Unfortunately, BBJ and Marvin were unable to use their nikons as the wrong part had been placed in the box from Adelaide...but we had a good night looking through the telescope.
![]() Canon
What sort of magnification do you get in ashot like this BigV? What a shame about the technical difficulties. Can you please post the exif data for me.
Cheers WW Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Willy, 400th of a sec, ISO 100...no aperture as the camera was connected to the telescope. I had placed a 6.3 focal reducer on the scope, which took the 2000mm f10 down to a 1260mm 6.3
Marvin and BBJ were nearly blinded by the moon when looking through the scope at it... This is what it looked like without the focal reducer.. ![]() Canon
So true, it near burnt our eyes out, had to let eye get used to it being so bright. Was truely amazing and very different looking at all the other suns etc... and BV's lazer is nothing to be sneazed at as Marvin and myself had a lil play with and damn that is bright.
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
Awesome images there Big V... so how to do you go about setting up a scope to fit a camera?
Tim D70 - D200/MBD200 Coming soon - Too Much Gear, Not Enough Talent
My Site: http://www.digitalstill.net My Fishing Site: http://www.fishseq.com
Great pic BigV and definitely the best telescope shot I have seen as well.
Quick question for you, how do you do your frames?? Are they a photoshop action?? Ive been hunting for a frame that looks similar to this for ages (I have what I want in my minds eye, but cant quite actually specify what it should look like). Cheers Rob Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
The camera needs a t-adapter, which attaches to your camera body like a normal lens but instead of having glass etc, it is just a hollow metal tube of 2 inch diameter which is then attached to the telescope..
My frames are an action that I found and slightly modified... Canon
Thanks for that info BigV - its very interesting to me. Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|