
70-300G @ 85mm, f9 1/1000sec, 400ISO
Taken in Taree at the weekend

Another example of a cheap lens performing beyond expectations

Just another seagull :)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Just another seagull :)![]() 70-300G @ 85mm, f9 1/1000sec, 400ISO Taken in Taree at the weekend ![]() Another example of a cheap lens performing beyond expectations ![]() *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
A nice capture Leon - got to see it just before SmugMug went offline for maintenance. A great capture with the bird in full glide and of course that lovely blue sky. Seems a little noisy though.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Yip - great timing eh ! This would have to have been the first time in about a year from my memory, so I can't complain too much. And unlike other services when they are down it usually means things will improve ![]() I know what you're saying with the noise - and this is after putting it through NeatImage! I may have to do a bit of a comparison test on noise levels at different ISO's. At 400ISO you wouldn't expect that much to be introduced ![]() *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Previous topic • Next topic
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|