

Lights in the skyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Lights in the skyI took this during rehearsals for the Australia Day concert in Canberra. I thought it looked pretty interesting from that perspective, but it lost some punch because the ISO was too high, so it's a bit noisy
![]() ![]() Craig - Canon 350D, EF-S 18-55, EF 70-300
I like the composition Craig, and it's very has a nice Mood to it as well.
Had it been raining, or is the surface naturally shiney ?
The surface is a little strange - during the day it looks like ordinary old slate, but at night it's glassy & has that nice green tinge to it. I'll head back there to get some better pics in the next week or 2. ![]() Craig - Canon 350D, EF-S 18-55, EF 70-300
nice capture.
as far as noise, have you tried some of the noise reduction software products out there. My favourite is neat image. Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Noise Ninja is another alternative, does the same sort of thing.
at least with my system and the test shots I used at the time, neat image was far superior to noise ninja.
I am sure others will say something else works better for them but neat image does it for me. I evaluated quite a few of them a year or so ago and settled for neat image. I had noise ninja around second from memory. Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
But it does it a lot quieter ![]() Thanks for the tips, but I did run it through Neat Image before posting - that's how noisy the original was... Craig - Canon 350D, EF-S 18-55, EF 70-300
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|